Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

The efficacy of two kinds of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in relation to a

ID: 3217167 • Letter: T

Question

The efficacy of two kinds of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) in relation to a clinical population were

compared. The therapies differed on the dimension of how wedded they were to the rational-emotive

behavioral therapy (REBT), a subtype of CBT that emphasizes a directive, confrontational approach to

encourage a patient to recognize the irrationality of specific thought patterns. Forty adolescents at an

inpatient clinic for treatment of self-destructive behaviors were randomly divided into two groups of

equal size, one of which received the less challenging type of CBT (Treatment A) and one of which

received the more challenging kind of CBT (Treatment B). All patients were treated by trained therapists

in one-on-one sessions for 1.5 hours per day (broken down into 45-minute sessions) for six weeks. All

participants were apprised that they were part of a study, all participants signed consent forms, and all

were told they would be informed of the results at its conclusion; participants exhibiting any behaviors

that required critical intervention were promptly treated outside the plan of the study. Outcome data

on the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist (RBPC)-PAR Edition* collected at the conclusion of six weeks

as shown below (also found in the Data Set Scenario 3 Excel file).

Treatment A Treatment B

74                              80

50                              82

70                              49

60                             44

30                              60

37                             65

34                              77

40                             45

39                              51

70                              70

19                               53

43                               16

25                               38

15                              44

1. Indicate sample size (n = ?), and describe what consequence(s) this sample size will have in terms of analyses and reporting.

2. Using the Choose Your Test document, select a statistical procedure appropriate to your scenario/data. Explain why you selected that test, linking features of the scenario/data to information from the Choose Your Test document.

(Each answer should be a full paragraph explaining your answer)

Explanation / Answer

1.

Here, there are two groups of data and the sample size for each of them is 14 so overall sample size of 28. The samples would play a role in determining the pooled standard deviation and consequently the t-test.

2.

The statitical procedure that would be used in this test would be t-test for two population means because the population is divided into two groups. The same can be calculated as below: -

H0: 1 - 2 = 0

H1: 1 - 2 0

            

Assuming population variances are equal, we would have to calculate pooled-variance t-Test wherein population 1 are treatment 1 and population 2 are treatment 2: -

Sp^2= (n1-1)S1^2+(n2-1)S2^2/(n1-1)+(n2-1)

         = (14-1)*19.12^2+(14-1)*18.39^2/13+13

         = 4750.8571+4394.8571/26

         =351.7582

tSTAT=(X1-X2)-(µ1-µ2)/Sp^2(1/n1+1/n2)

       =(43.29-55.29)-0/351.7582(1/14+1/14)

       =-12/7.09

       =-1.69

tCRIT is +/-2.055 and hence cannot reject the null hypothesis since tCRIT< tSTAT and falls within the rejection region.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote