A case-control study was conducted in Minnesota to study the association between
ID: 3173740 • Letter: A
Question
A case-control study was conducted in Minnesota to study the association between drinking soda and diabetes. The study reported an odds ratio of 1.9 for diabetes among subjects who drank more than 1L soda per week (the exposed group) compared to those who did not drink soda (the reference group). The 95% confidence interval for this odds ratio was (0.7-4.6) and the p-value was 0.11.
Interpret the odds ratio
Interpret the 95% confidence interval
Is this a wide or narrow confidence interval?
Interpret the p-value
Explanation / Answer
Result:
A case-control study was conducted in Minnesota to study the association between drinking soda and diabetes. The study reported an odds ratio of 1.9 for diabetes among subjects who drank more than 1L soda per week (the exposed group) compared to those who did not drink soda (the reference group). The 95% confidence interval for this odds ratio was (0.7-4.6) and the p-value was 0.11.
Interpret the odds ratio
There is risk of 1.9 times more for diabetes among subjects who drank more than 1L soda per week (the exposed group) compared to those who did not drink soda.
Interpret the 95% confidence interval
We are 95% confident that odds ratio for all diabetes among subjects who drank more than 1L soda per week (the exposed group) compared to those who did not drink soda fall between (0.7 , 4.6).
If the confidence interval contains the value 1, (0.7, 4.6), this means there is no difference between the two groups..
Is this a wide or narrow confidence interval?
The width is about 3.9 which is narrow.
Interpret the p-value
P value =0.11 which is > 0.05 level of significance. This result was statistically not significant.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.