A public health officer conducts a warrantless search of a private residence in

Question

A public health officer conducts a warrantless search of a private residence in search of rodents. Reports of rodents have been made to the public health agency by several neighbors over a period of several months. The public officer sites and fines the owner under a municipal health ordinance when evidence of rodents is confirmed by the search. The owner sues the city and refuses to pay the fine because he claims the search was unconstitutional and any information gathered on an unconstitutional search is inadmissible under the exclusionary rule. Who is right? Back up answer by case?

Explanation / Answer

Answer:

The health department is correct because the government can overseas "no reasonable expectations of privacy" for health and safety purposes by united states v.Biswell (1972) and Colanadde Catering Corp v. United states (1970).

Actually this is not a physics question but I have seen this in somewhere, that is why I answered this question.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse A
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.