Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Suppose IQ scores were obtained from randomly selected siblings. For 20 such pai

ID: 3152127 • Letter: S

Question

Suppose IQ scores were obtained from randomly selected siblings. For 20 such pairs of people, the linear correlation coefficient is 0.927 and the equation of the regression line is y = 5.49 + 0.96x, where x represents the IQ score of the older child. Also, the 20 x values have a mean of 99.24 and the 20 y values have a mean of 101.1. What is the best predicted IQ of the younger child, given that the older child has an IQ of 107? Use a significance level of 0.05. Click the icon to view the critical values of the Pearson correlation coefficient r. The best predicted IQ of the younger child is

Explanation / Answer

Answer:

First we need to understand why these values of pearson correlation coefficient, mean of X (Older child) values, mean Y (younger child) values are given. Actually,we can test or validate the acceptance of the given regression line at 5% significance level using these given values statistically. If we see that we can well accept the given regression line at 5% significance level, then we can directly use this regression line for predicting the requirement.

Here, correlation, r = 0.927 and regression coefficient, b= 0.96.

We know that b=r*Sy/Sx. Hence using value of r and b, we get Sy/Sx = 1.04 (upto 2 decimal place).

We can validate the value of Sy/Sx by its statistical distribution.Since, both the samples have equal number of observations, i.e. 20, we can say Sy/Sx will have an F-distribution with (19,19) df (since number of observations are same for both the sample, ratio of corresponding dfs will lead to 1 in Sy/Sx). From the table of F-distribution we get crtical values as 2.168 at 5% significance level. So observed value of Sy/Sx (1.04) is smaller than critical value at 5% significance. Hence we claim that Sy/Sx and hence regression coefficient is significant or acceptable at 5% significance level. Similarly if we check for intercept (,a=5.49 here), we can see from the given values of mean of both samples and regression coefficient, intercept coming out to be 5.83 (to two dp) and it is also significant at 5% level of significance (we can validate it by Z-test). So. we see that given regression line pass at 5% significance level.

Now we can put the value of X=107 in the regression equation to get the predicted IQ for Y.

Hence, the best predicetd IQ of the younger child is = 5.49+(0.96*107) = 108.21 (upto two dp)

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote