Use the laws of logic to prove the conclusion from the hypotheses. Give proposit
ID: 3143597 • Letter: U
Question
Use the laws of logic to prove the conclusion from the hypotheses. Give propositions and predicate variable names in your proof. The hypotheses are:
If I drive on the freeway, I will see the fire.
I will either drive on the freeway or take surface streets.
I am not going to take surface streets.
Conclude that I will see the fire.
part 2
Which of the following arguments are valid? Explain your reasoning.
I have a student in my class who is getting an A. Therefore, John, a student in my class is getting an A.
Every girl scouts who sells at least 50 boxes of cookies will get a prize. Suzy, a girl scout, got a prize. Therefore Suzy sold 50 boxes of cookies.
Explanation / Answer
1. Let A: I will drvie on the freeway B: I will see the fire C: I will take surface streets
The given statements can be translated as:
If I drive on the freeway, I will see the fire : A -> B
I will either drive on the freeway or take surface streets : A v C
I am not going to take surface streets : ~C
The three statements can be combined as
(A -> B) ^ (A v C) ^ ~C
= (A -> B) ^ (~A -> C) ^ ~C (Law of material implication)
= (A -> B) ^ A (Modus tollens)
= B (Modus ponens)
Hence the conclusion is I will see the fire.
2. Let s: Student of my class and A(x): Getting an A. Let j: John
I have a student in my class who is getting an A : s, A(s)
John need not be the student i.e j s could be true
=> ~A(j) could be true and the given sentence is invalid.
Let G: girl scout. C: Selling 50 boxes of cookies. P: Getting a prize.
s: Suzy
Every girl scouts who sells at least 50 boxes of cookies will get a prize: x G, C(x) -> P(x)
Suzy, a girl scout, got a prize : s G, P(s)
Since P(s) is true, C(s) need not be true. Reason: false -> true is also true.
Therefore the statement is invalid.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.