: Review and critique a peer-reviewed paper, employing the statistical analysis

Question

: Review and critique a peer-reviewed paper, employing the statistical analysis of primary data, from the following list. The journal papers may be found in the Business > ABI Inform/Proquest database in the Baker College Online Library. Write a 1-2 page critique paper that discusses at least the following: 1. Describe the research problem the author(s) are addressing. 2. Describe the base literature the author is working from. What previous research or theory does the author go to as a basis for the present paper? You will typically find this in the first few pages of the work, possibly in a section headed "Review of the Literature". In addition to citing some of the major sources quoted - tell me, in summary form, how the author built his/her work on top of previous writings. 3. What are the author(s) hypotheses? Often, these will be formally stated in the paper. In some cases, they can be inferred based on the statistical tests being done. If the author gives a weak (or non-existent) hypothesis, read the rest of the paper and infer a hypothesis. 4. What research method and statistical techniques does the author(s) use? To answer this question, be sure to tell how the authors collected their data (survey, experiment, etc.). What was the sample size? How did they analyze their data? Note that you need not be familiar with the statistical techniques, simply let the class know what technique is being used. Example statistical techniques include regression, ANOVA, t-test, factor analysis, discriminate analysis and others. 5. What conclusions does the author(s) draw? Does he/she support his/her hypotheses? 6. Write a brief critique of the work - Is it plausible? Do you see any holes development of the hypothesis, the definition of variables, or in the methodology? Is the research of significance to you? The critique should be properly cited, using APA 6th edition.

Explanation / Answer

As he/ she define the different section in each paper and for each section we can ranking methods used as quality data will converted into qualitative data then we may apply the factor anlysis for find all reviewed work of all paper. using this method we create a group of the section and they also tell how much variation explained. then after we classified the critique work in different group. one we also do with this data find the rank correleation its tell the how sections are correlated. from my point of hypothesis testing is not help ful in statistical analysis.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse #
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.