Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

According to the results of Tukey’s HSD, S-N-K and Bonferonni post hoc tests, wh

ID: 3060460 • Letter: A

Question

According to the results of Tukey’s HSD, S-N-K and Bonferonni post hoc tests, what can be concluded about the effects of the three treatments?

Post Hoc Tests Multiple Comparisons Dependent Variable VAR00002 Mean 95% Confidence Interval Difference (l- Std. Error 47246 47246 47246 47246 47246 47246 47246 47246 47246 47246 47246 47246 Lower Bound 3.6909 2.8159 1.3091 .3159 4341 2.0659 3.7290 2.8540 1.2710 .3540 3960 2.1040 Upper Bound 1.3091 .4341 3.6909 2.0659 2.8159 3159 1.2710 .3960 3.7290 2.1040 2.8540 3540 () VAR00001 (J) VAR00001 J) Si 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.00 3.00 1.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 2.50000 1.62500 2.50000 87500 1.62500 87500 2.50000 1.62500 2.50000 87500 1.62500 87500 Tukey HSD 1.00 007 2.00 178 007 178 3.00 Bonferroni 1.00 007 2.00 234 007 234 3.00 *. The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level

Explanation / Answer

From the Tukey’s HSD, S-N-K and Bonferonni post hoc tests and an analysis of variance (ANOVA) on these scores again yielded significant variation among conditions, A post hoc Tukey test showed that the future alone and future belonging groups differed significantly at p < .05; the misfortune control group was not significantly different from the other three treatments, lying somewhere in the middle.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote