Fozze Bear, stands convicted for the heinous murder of Miss Piggy. Your supervis

Question

Fozze Bear, stands convicted for the heinous murder of Miss Piggy. Your supervising attorney is filing an appeal based, in part, on negative comments made by the prosecutor regarding Mr. Bear. Apparently, prosecution referred to the defendant as “evil-doer” and a “son of the Devil” during her closing arguments. On this issue, your office asserts prosecutorial misconduct. The respondent counter-argues that counsel for the defense opened the door to these characterizations when, in his own closing argument, he stated that, “certainly, whoever committed this act is a devil’s spawn.”

i. Locate and correctly cite relevant secondary authority
ii. Provide your exact search query – Include database id
iii. State the legal issue/s involved after studying the information therein
iv. Locate an on point case from the 3rd Circuit of the US Court of Appeals
v. Review the Court’s Holdings and the relevant headnote from the opinion. Does the case appear to work for or against your client?

Explanation / Answer

1) according to the given informations it is not that the mister bear is the devil and he had done the misfortune things. it is to be investigate properly to know that mr bear is really the devil or it is another one who has done this. so it should be investigate.

2) the search should be trigerred from the initial levelo of the authority that it is it should be analyse from the beginning of the accidents or whatever the misfortune takes place there. then assemble them in a proper sequence. study the incidents carefully and try to correlate with the situations. ask some question to them who might be involeved in this and try to catch the evidence and then it will be reveal.

3) the legal issue will be that the case is related with any evidence which are present or not. the discussion of the court and the time periods which will be required for the completion of the overall discussions till the final result is taken out.

4)they appeal for the evidence which are related with the situations so that the case can be turn in the correct directions and thus the results can be drawn out without the results rapidly without consuming much time with efficiently.

5) the court holding is good and efficient and related with the evidence approachable. the justifications is done on the basis of the available evidence. they do not disobeyed the proof and thus help each other to study the case properly and try to put the culprit behind the bars.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse F
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.