Explain what Baptist means by \"the new slavery.\" How did it differ from the ol
ID: 2946131 • Letter: E
Question
Explain what Baptist means by "the new slavery." How did it differ from the older version? How did slave owners manage to increase cotton production on plantations in the early nineteenth century?For this paper you need to consider the evidence that Baptist provides. I only want you to use evidence from chapters 1-4. From the book “the half has never been told” Explain what Baptist means by "the new slavery." How did it differ from the older version? How did slave owners manage to increase cotton production on plantations in the early nineteenth century?
For this paper you need to consider the evidence that Baptist provides. I only want you to use evidence from chapters 1-4. From the book “the half has never been told” Explain what Baptist means by "the new slavery." How did it differ from the older version? How did slave owners manage to increase cotton production on plantations in the early nineteenth century?
For this paper you need to consider the evidence that Baptist provides. I only want you to use evidence from chapters 1-4. From the book “the half has never been told”
Explanation / Answer
1. The body of african america sutured together in the trauma of slavery expansion.
one profited enslavers, white america north and south, had again and again agreed to co-exploit this body which was the new slavery of the cotton fields
the new slavery of the British Caribbean was a phenomenon to be understood not only in terms of possessive individualism but also with reference to persons being forced to be useful to England, perhaps to their own ultimate benefit.
The new slavery--High-profit exploitation of poor people is increasing rapidly with globalisation of markets. Kevin Bales reports on the millions being ignored by governments
2.
Baptist calls Olmstead and Rhode “profoundly naïve” about the plantation records that anchor their research. “These are not documents that were generated to test seeds,” he says. “They are documents that were generated to measure labor. And to measure labor that was being extracted by force. And to measure labor that we know, from dozens and dozens of different testimonies by people who survived it, was generated by the threat of being whipped for not picking enough cotton.”
When economists gripe about historians retreating from economics, historians offer a counternarrative: “The problem is the economists left history for statistical model building,” says Eric Foner, a historian of 19th-century America at Columbia University. “History for them is just a source of numbers, a source of data to throw into their equations.” Foner considers counterfactuals absurd. A historian’s job is not to speculate about alternative universes, he says. It’s to figure out what happened and why. And, in the history that actually took place, cotton was extremely important in the Industrial Revolution.
3.
Baptist paints a picture of the plantation as a kind of factory that used "torture" and a speed-up "pushing" system to increase the amount of cotton slaves picked. "Every single day, calibrated pain, regular as a turning gear, challenged enslaved people to exceed the previous day's gains in production," Baptist writes. Between 1820 and 1860, the productivity of cotton-pickers doubled.
Baptist writes also of religion and the impact of slavery and the southwestern cotton boom on American politics, touching on everything from music to the Nat Turner rebellion. At times it feels like he's taken on too much.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.