for #18 finally got a correct answer from one of you guys of how they got -3.69
ID: 2932919 • Letter: F
Question
for #18 finally got a correct answer from one of you guys of how they got -3.69 as t value. my question is why doesnt it work on ti 84? i plug in n1=100, n2=150, x bar1= 35, x bar2=50, s1=900, and s2=1050. i also choose the less than function. i use the 2 sampttest on ti84? can i only get correct answer by using formula, or is there a way to do it on ti 84 that i havent figured out.
in their A random sampie of bar famillies in Metropolis Asssume that the two posolaiovariances are equal data on length of Metropolis M-50 monsSve-10so level of significance is Qouz Ditaz--233 15 Reemting s Scenario 0-3 uppose a 0.01. s reieched is not rejected selevant hwpothesis test A) The B) The O The mul hypothesis is reincted exists on which to make aExplanation / Answer
S1 = sqrt(900) = 30
S2 = sqrt(1050) = 32.40
This should solve the problem and you will get the same result from formula and Ti-84. Since the std deviations are almost same use pooled 2 sample ttest
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.