A model for the time elapsed between the arrival of consecutivevehicles on urban
ID: 2914755 • Letter: A
Question
A model for the time elapsed between the arrival of consecutivevehicles on urban roads.Following are 137 arrival times(in seconds) along with the valuesexpected from a theoretical model.
TIME OBSERVED EXPECTED
0-2 18 23
2-4 28 18
4-6 14 16
6-8 7 13
8-10 11 11
10-12 11 9
12-18 10 20
18-22 8 8
>22 30 19
Can you conclude that the theoretical model does not explain theobserved value well?
Explanation / Answer
Null Hypothesis: the theoretical model does notexplain the observed value well Alternative Hypothesis: the theoretical modeldoes explain the observed value well Consider the following table TIME OBSERVED(Oi) EXPECTED(Ei) (Oi-Ei)^2 (Oi-Ei)^2/Ei 0-2 18 23 25 1.086957 2 to 4 28 18 100 5.555556 4 to 6 14 16 4 0.25 6 to 8 7 13 36 2.769231 8 to 10 11 11 0 0 10 to 12 11 9 4 0.444444 12 to 18 10 20 100 5 18-22 8 8 0 0 >22 30 19 121 6.368421 21.47461 TIME OBSERVED(Oi) EXPECTED(Ei) (Oi-Ei)^2 (Oi-Ei)^2/Ei 0-2 18 23 25 1.086957 2 to 4 28 18 100 5.555556 4 to 6 14 16 4 0.25 6 to 8 7 13 36 2.769231 8 to 10 11 11 0 0 10 to 12 11 9 4 0.444444 12 to 18 10 20 100 5 18-22 8 8 0 0 >22 30 19 121 6.368421 21.47461The critical value of chi-square at (9-1) =8df andat 0.05, the level of significance is 15.51 Since the p-value is greater than the criticalvalue of chi-square so we reject the null hypothesis and concludethat the theoretical model does explain the observed valuewell
TIME OBSERVED(Oi) EXPECTED(Ei) (Oi-Ei)^2 (Oi-Ei)^2/Ei 0-2 18 23 25 1.086957 2 to 4 28 18 100 5.555556 4 to 6 14 16 4 0.25 6 to 8 7 13 36 2.769231 8 to 10 11 11 0 0 10 to 12 11 9 4 0.444444 12 to 18 10 20 100 5 18-22 8 8 0 0 >22 30 19 121 6.368421 21.47461
Related Questions
Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.