A major health care organization conducted a study relating the risk of heart at
ID: 2909701 • Letter: A
Question
A major health care organization conducted a study relating the risk of heart attack to a patient's age, blood pressure, and HDL cholesterol. They have hypothesized the following relationship:
Y = ?0 + ?1X1 + ?2X2 + ?3X3
where Y is heart attack risk, Xl is patient's age, X2 is blood pressure, and X3 is HDL level. Data are collected and a regression relationship is determined through the use of the computer. The following Excel output is obtained:
Regression Statistics ANOVA df SS MS F Significance F
Multiple R .828 Regression 3 3201.82 1067.27 11.66 .0003
R Square .686 Residual (Error) 16 1464.98 91.56
Standard Error 9.57 Total 19 4666.80
Observations 20
Coefficients Standard Error t-Stat P-Value
Intercept -101.92 - - -
X1 1.1400 0.2554 4.463 .0004
X2 0.3521 0.0744 4.367 .0005
X3 -0.0935 0.3108 - 0.301 .7674
The result of conducting the hypothesis test described in the previous question at the 5% level of significance is??????????
The value of the sample multiple coefficient of determination is????????????????
we can say that ______________ percent of the variation in heart attack risk, y, is explained by the regression relationship.?????
The result of conducting a hypothesis to determine if the relationship between heart attack risk and HDL Level is significant at the alpha=0.05 level is????????
Based on your answers to the last few questions, you may make which of the following statements about the regression relationship
Explanation / Answer
null hypothesis H0 :model is not significant
alternative hypothesis H1: model is significant
Decision rule :-
i) if F calculated < Fcritical then accept null hypothesis H0 at level of significance 0.05
ii) if F calculated > Fcritical then reject null hypothesis H0 at level of significance 0.05
a) The result of conducting the hypothesis test described in the previous question at the 5% level of significance is
from the anova table ,Fcalculated(11.66) > Fsignificant( .0003) so reject the null hypothesis
so the model is significant
b) The value of the sample multiple coefficient of determination is 0.828 (from table Multiple R )
c) we can say that 9.57 percent of the variation in heart attack risk, y, is explained by the regression relationship.
=> because for finding variation in the model we use standard error.it useful to calculate the vatiation in the response variable so it is 9.57
d) The result of conducting a hypothesis to determine if the relationship between heart attack risk and HDL Level is significant at the alpha=0.05 level is
=>Decision rule :-
i) if p value > 0.05 l.o.s then accept null hypothesis H0 at level of significance 0.05
ii) if p value < 0.05 l.o.s if then reject null hypothesis H0 at level of significance 0.05
here pvalue( 0.7674) > 0.05 level of significance so accept null hypothesis that there is no effect of HDLcholesterol level on heart attack
conclusion :- from the above model regression relationship we can say that the model is good and there is significant effect of patients age and blood pressure but not of HDL level
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.