Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Federal Electricity & Water Authority (FEWA) has two renewal energy alternatives

ID: 2793957 • Letter: F

Question

Federal Electricity & Water Authority (FEWA) has two renewal energy alternatives are available for providing energy at a remote government research facility. The cash flow estimates associated with each alternative are given below. Use the conventional B-C ratio method, with Annual Worth as the equivalent-worth measure, to determine which alternative should be selected at an interest rate of 10% per year over a 25-year study period. One alternative must be selected.                                                                                                   

Alternative I

Alternative II

Initial cost, $

$1,000,000

$990,000

Annual maintenance costs, $/yr

$380,000

$359,500

Annual benefits, $/yr

$500,000

$459,500

Salvage value, $

$17,000

$15,800

Benefit Cost ratio for Alternative 1:

Benefit Cost ratio for Alternative II:

Incremental Benefit Cost Ratio

Alternative selected

1.02

1.06

0.231

Alternative I

Alternative II

1.60

1.20

0.30

Alternative I

Alternative II

Initial cost, $

$1,000,000

$990,000

Annual maintenance costs, $/yr

$380,000

$359,500

Annual benefits, $/yr

$500,000

$459,500

Salvage value, $

$17,000

$15,800

Explanation / Answer

Federal Electricity & Water Authority Cash Flow estimates associated with each alternative are given below: Alternative I Alternative II Initial cost, $ $1,000,000 $990,000 Annual maintenance costs, $/yr $380,000 $359,500 Annual benefits, $/yr $500,000 $459,500 Salvage value, $ $17,000 $15,800 Determine Alternative Interest rate 10% Period 25 years Conventional B-C ratio: B-C ratio                                         = AW(B) CR+AW(O&M) CR $1,017,000                                        = $500,000 $1,017,000(A/P,10%,25)+$380,000                                      = 500000 NPV($1,017,000,10%,25)+$3,80,000                                    = 380,000 NPV$1,000,000, 10%,25 years 93865                      CR+AW(O&M) 473,865                                   = 1.06 Benefit Cost ratio for Alternative 1: 1.06 Option B Conventional B-C ratio: B-C ratio                                         = AW(B) CR+AW(O&M)                                        = $459,500 $1,005800(A/P,10%,25)+$359,500 CR 1005800                                      = $459,500 NPV($1,005800,10%,25)+$359,500                                    = 359,500 NPV$1,000,000, 10%,25 years 92831                              CR+AW(O&M) 452331                                   = 1.02 Benefit Cost ratio for Alternative 2: 1.02 Option A Incremental ratio Alternative Benefit 1 B1 $46,148.00 NPV($500,000) Alternative Benefit 2 B2 $42,410.01 NPV($459,500) CR+AW(O&M) Alternative cost 1 C1 1033503.447 $1000,000+ NPV($380,000)-NPV($17,000) Alternative Cost 2 C2 1,021,722 990000+NPV(359,500)-NPV($15,800) B2- B1 -3737.99 C2-C1 -11,781 Incremental Benefit cost ratio Option H 0.3 Option H Alternative selected Alternative 1 has better ratio that’s is more than 1 Alternative 1 has 1.06          > Alternative 2has 1.02