A firm has a $100 million capital budge. It is considering two projects that eac
ID: 2650916 • Letter: A
Question
A firm has a $100 million capital budge. It is considering two projects that each cost $100 million. Project A has an IRR of 20 percent, and NPV of $9 million, and will be terminated after 1 year at a profit of $20 million, resulting in an immediate increase in EPS. Project B, which cannot be postponed, has an IRR of 30 percent and an NPV of $50 million. However, the firm’s short-run EPS will be reduced if it accepts Project B, because no revenues will be generated for several years.
a. Should the short-run effects on EPS influence the choice between the two projects?
b. How might situations like this influence a firm’s decision to use payback?
Explanation / Answer
Answer:
Evaluation of Projects
Project A
Project B
Cost
$ 100,000,000
$ 100,000,000
IRR
20%
30%
NPV
$ 9,000,000
$ 50,000,000
Effect on EPS
Immediate increase
Short run reduction
Ans-a:
Effect on EPS can not effect the decision making as decision is taken on the basis of IRR and NPV
Ans-b:
Co. can use the Payback period for evaluation as it would let it know the time period in which the project shall give back the initial cost back.
Evaluation of Projects
Project A
Project B
Cost
$ 100,000,000
$ 100,000,000
IRR
20%
30%
NPV
$ 9,000,000
$ 50,000,000
Effect on EPS
Immediate increase
Short run reduction
Ans-a:
Effect on EPS can not effect the decision making as decision is taken on the basis of IRR and NPV
Ans-b:
Co. can use the Payback period for evaluation as it would let it know the time period in which the project shall give back the initial cost back.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.