As a fraud expert asked to investigate possible fraud at a local nonprofit organ

Question

As a fraud expert asked to investigate possible fraud at a local nonprofit organization, you suspect that one of the workers, Stacey, has been embezzling money. After securing enough evidence to be very confident of Stacey's guilt, you speak with the president of the organization, Jamie. Jamie assures you that Stacey could be doing nothing wrong, that she has known Stacey for years, and that Stacey is a good person. Further, she indicates that because of her relationship with Stacey, even if something were going wrong, no action would be taken with respect to the potential fraud. How do you respond to Jamie? How do you explain to her what is at stake?

Explanation / Answer

In the present case Stacey, an employee has been embezzling money. But the President of the organization Jamie, has so much believe on Stacey that she could not do wrong.

As Stacey is working for more than 10 years at certain extent we have believe on her, even after showing evidence that she has done wrong, jamie is not going to take action against her. This is very wrong thing done by the Jamie. If we relieve Stacey for not taking action against her, the other employess has take advantage on the basis of even if we have done wrong thing nobody is going to take action against them.

So in this case Jamie has to take action against Stacey.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse A
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.