2. A road to be designed from A to D located 11,000 ft apart. Two alternatives a
ID: 2312737 • Letter: 2
Question
2. A road to be designed from A to D located 11,000 ft apart. Two alternatives are available for the vertical alignment of the road. Alternative 1 uses one grade from A to D, whereas alternative 2 goes through B and C as shown below. . The elevations of points A, B, C and D are 1,000, 1,270, 1,270 and 1,540 ft, respectively. Which alternative would provide a better operating speed of a typical truck starting at a speed of 50 mph at point A? What can you conclude from the results of this problem as far as designing a steep and long grade between two points? 3,000 ft 5,000 ft 3,000 ftExplanation / Answer
Solution:
case 1:
Point A to B the Gradient is 14%, Which is Greater to the Exceptional gradient mountain terrain,and steep terrain having elevation upto 3000m of value 8%.
In this cases the length of road is very critical length of road.
So here Gradient lies between A&B IS RANGE 12 To 15%,So reduction in vechicle speed as compare to flat grade %.
In Light vechicle 10-15 km/h, In heavy vechicle 15% maximum negotible .
This type of Road is suitability for low volume load (very few or no commercial vechicle)
Case 2 :
The gradient between A and B is 33% Which is greater to exceptional gradient.
In case of light vechicle very low, In case heavy vechicle not negotiable.
In cases of C to D the gradient value is 51% , so such high gradient in not use for any type of traffic.
Note: Case 1 type road is given better operating speed as compare to Case 2:
To better design in case 2 , in portion A to C provide summit curve and portion B to D provide valley curve , If doing this the case 2 is more suitable for operating speed,
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.