Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Question 17 (1 point) Why did Adolf Eichmann argue, at his trial, that he had do

ID: 131714 • Letter: Q

Question

Question 17 (1 point) Why did Adolf Eichmann argue, at his trial, that he had done nothing wrong? O He was being falsely accused of committing acts that he had not committed He believed morality was a private choice He did not break any laws of his country He was coerced (lacked free will) into doing what he had done because his family would have been sent to prison or exterminated if he had not followed orders. Save Question 18 (1 point) Which of the folowing is most likely to follow as a result of adopting culturol relativism? greater acceptance of constructive criticism of one's own cultural norms respect and tolerance for the norms and values of different cutures suspicion and distrust of the norms and values of different cultures

Explanation / Answer

17) Correct answer- He did not break any laws of his country

Adolf Eichmann simply said he had done nothing wrong as he was just following the orders which were given to him by his superiors. Eichmann argued that he was innocent as he did not break the laws of his country at that time and was just carry out orders which were given to him.

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote