Question 4 of 13 1.0 Points Referring to the information provided in question 3,

Question

Question 4 of 13 1.0 Points Referring to the information provided in question 3, write a conclusion for the researcher. (Assume ? is 0.1 or less.) A. Because this probability is small, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. B. Because this probability is small, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. C. Because this probability is not small, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. D. Because this probability is not small, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. Reset Selection

Mark for Review What's This? Question 5 of 13 1.0 Points In a clinical trial, 16 out of 650 patients taking a prescription drug complained of flulike symptoms. Suppose that it is known that 1.7% of patients taking competing drugs complain of flulike symptoms. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that more than 1.7% of this drug Question 4 of 13 1.0 Points Referring to the information provided in question 3, write a conclusion for the researcher. (Assume ? is 0.1 or less.) A. Because this probability is small, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. B. Because this probability is small, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. C. Because this probability is not small, reject the null hypothesis. There is sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. D. Because this probability is not small, do not reject the null hypothesis. There is not sufficient evidence to conclude that the dart-picking strategy resulted in a majority of winners. Reset Selection

Mark for Review What's This? Question 5 of 13 1.0 Points In a clinical trial, 16 out of 650 patients taking a prescription drug complained of flulike symptoms. Suppose that it is known that 1.7% of patients taking competing drugs complain of flulike symptoms. Is there sufficient evidence to conclude that more than 1.7% of this drug

Explanation / Answer

1) b is correct
2) D is correct

3) A is correct

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse Q
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.