The historical incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in medical clients at a u
ID: 123162 • Letter: T
Question
The historical incidence of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in medical clients at a university hospital was 2.5%. This figure dropped to 2% among an experimental group during the implementation of a new prophylaxis regimen. What is the nurse's most accurate interpretation of this finding? A) The relative risk (RR) of DVT among medical clients is 2/100. B) The regimen results in a 20% RR reduction. C) The absolute risk of DVT among the control group is 2.5%. D) The results of the intervention are valid and reliable.Explanation / Answer
The incidentrate of Deep Vein Thrombosis is 2.5 in 100 patients.
In experimental group its reduced to 2 in 100 clients, during the implementation of new prophylaxis.
It means there is significant difference in experimental group than control. So, Answer D) is most suitableone
D). The resuslt of the intervention are valid and reliable.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.