case #1- http://sandulligrace.com/termination-upheld-when-safety-violation-was-i

Question

case #1- http://sandulligrace.com/termination-upheld-when-safety-violation-was-intentional-and-there-were-prior-disciplines/

case #2- http://www.lawtimesnews.com/article/arbitrator-upholds-termination-over-safety-breaches-9525/

Referencing the 2 cases above please answer the below questions.

Summarize the arbitration reports, including the nature of each case and the arbitrators’ rulings.

What factors influenced the arbitrators’ decisions? Did these factors differ between the two cases?

Compare the criteria that arbitrators used to make their decisions in each case. If criteria has changed during the time between the two cases, discuss if this change is positive or negative.

Explanation / Answer

Answer)

The Labour Arbitration Institute have arbitrators who have taken out rulings in the case provided below as:

The Case - A two - year employee have used only one handle out of the two given on a press machine. The reasons provided by him were that the work can be done faster hence, more money he can earned and his left arm was paining due to carpal tunnel syndrome so he was avoiding his left arm in the activity.

Now, the rulings provided by the five panelists arbitrators are as follows:

So, to summarize the rulings of this case it is established and true fact that the employee with their misconduct can place their safety and health into danger and this can be extended to their fellow employees as well. According to Elizabeth Mills, ' due diligence required by statute goes hand in hand with appropriate disciplinary actions.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.