For this assignment, you will write a rough draft of a rhetorical analysis essay

Question

For this assignment, you will write a rough draft of a rhetorical analysis essay and post it as an attachment to the Discussion Area. After you post your rough draft, you will provide feedback to two peers using the discussion participation questions below. Post your rough draft of at least 500 words to the Discussion Area as a Microsoft Word attachment, respond to at least two classmates with reviews of their drafts. Resources: Read the information for writing your essay in this week's online lectures and in chapter 8 of your text, Writing Arguments. On pages 171-174, you will see an example of a rhetorical analysis essay. Create your essay in this APA-formatted template. Study the articles presented on the two websites below. Notice how the perspective of the authors, the National Wildlife Federation and BP United States, impacts the information presented. National Wildlife Federation. (2016). How does the BP oil spill impact wildlife and habitat Retrieved from http://www.nwf.org/What-We-Do/Protect-Habit/Gulf- Restoration/Oil-Spill/Effects-on-Wildlife.aspx BP United States. (2016) Gulf of environmental restoration. Retrieved from http/www.bp.com/en_us/bp-us/commrtment-to-the-gulf-of-mexico/gulf- environmental-restoration.html Choose one of the two articles to focus on for your rhetorical analysis essay. Write a rough draft of your essay that is at least 500 words in length, following the guidelines below: In the introduction, identify the topic of the article you have chosen and explain why it is controversial Provide a short summary of the article. Write a thesis statement at the end of your introduction in which you share why you think the article is ineffective. Use tis APA Citation Helper for assistance in correctly citing the article. In three body paragraphs, analyze what is wrong with the article in terms of the credibility of the author, the logic of the argument, and how the author manipulates the reader's emotions. Discuss the author's credibility Note how the organization s focus influences what is presented in the article. Does the author (organization or corporate sponsor) benefit if readers believe what he or she says? Discuss the logic of the argument. Explain whether the evidence used actually proves the point the author is trying to make. How does the official purpose of the website impact the information it contains? Discuss the author's appeal to the reader's emotions Do readers feel manipulated by emotion, or are their feelings engaged appropriately? Draw conclusions about the believability of the article overall, In your concluding paragraph, present your final assessment of the article Share the conclusions you reached through the analysis that you engaged in the body of your essay.

Explanation / Answer

Today the world population is increasing in a very rapid rate. due to which many environmental consequences as well as many problems related to environment are happening in day to day life. our environment is badly polluted by a great percentage of human activities as well as by the small percentage of natural disasters. but the fact is that human contributing more in terms of pullution to the enviroment. as this effect the environment as well as aslo destroying the life of wild creatures with a great lose.

It can be estimated by recent accident of BP oil spill over the gulf. as this can be considered as a human mistake due to which oil; spill over the gulf and hence badly polluted and contaminated the water bodies and hence directly infuence and effect the life of wild life. whether the wild life is marine or terresterial, both are influenced badly. this create killing of a very large numbers of sea and water boy animals as well effect the food chain system of wild life of terresterial animals. it is because fishes are also the part of food chain of land animals.

From the estimation of the concept and study of oil spill it was found that it polluted and contaminated the water bodies upto 80% due to which many life of marine creature goes to reduced. it contaminated the bodies in such an extent that the level of dissolved oxygen is also reduced to very low amount and hence resulted the process of eutrophication in the water body.

But according to the author, it was not to the point of losses or degradation. according to him it just an accident and not focused on the hazard situation which may produced on behalf of that later on. if suppose the reader is agree to the author without knowing the accuracy than it may lead to misunderstand rather to be benefits. the author is trying to make understand the readers according to his ways and in point of view he supposed to be correct. in article he described the evidence for the understand wihout misunderstand and people will able to know properly about that. he is so geniunely described in article that the readers may not be feel like manipulated by the emotions.

So the conclusion is that it all based on the concept of wildlife protection and well being of atmosphere and environment. the author just want to make the people aware of which activities of human leads to create damages to the wild life as well as our environment. it is very important that we have to focus on our environment and take the proper measurement before we do any huge activity and which can create problems if not manage properly. suppose the case of oil spill over water body. we all aware of this thing that if we not take care the enviroment than we destroy enviroment as well as ourselves too oil spill create a lot of contamination and pollution to the water body. it is so unfit for living creature that they can;t utilize it and hence dying in a big ratio. the author want to make people aware of this mis ativities effect to us as well as our environment.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse F
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.