For a change project: What anitseptic treatment chlorahexidine vs povidone is mo

Question

For a change project: What anitseptic treatment chlorahexidine vs povidone is more effective in reducing infections related to central venous catheters?

What tangible and intangible resources will be needed to implement the project?

What improved outcomes do you anticipate will occur that could indicate the project produced a successful return on investment (ROI) of these resources?

How will you communicate your plan for change with key decision makers so that they will support the allocation of the resources you are seeking?

Nursing

Explanation / Answer

Studies involving antiseptic treatment chlorhexidine versus povidone, it was observed that rate of infection was lesser in the case of patients treated with Chlorhexidine. It can be said Chlorhexidine is more effective, however there's no definitive proof stating which one is better to use.

Financial resources will be required for a further research onto this topic. Not only that, infrastructure as well as a skilled team will be necessary to work on the project.

It is highly impractical to anticipate any outcomes based on available information, but if a hypothesis was to be made, it would most likely be the reduced costs as well as improved efficiency of using these antiseptics.

For any successful acquisition, it is necessary for presenting the advantages forward, with feasible countermeasure against the disadvantages.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse F
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.