There is a new proposal to ban retailers from selling menthol cigarettes and fla

Question

There is a new proposal to ban retailers from selling menthol cigarettes and flavored tobacco-products in San Francisco, in hopes of minimizing consumption by youth and minorities.
The question: Do you think if this proposal was passed, the industry would just come up with new products that are legal and target youth populations?

Is this proposed ban on menthol cigarettes and flavored tobacco products restricting the rights of the industry as well as the rights of the people who choose to buy them? Or do the health risks surpass the right to buy and sell these products?
There is a new proposal to ban retailers from selling menthol cigarettes and flavored tobacco-products in San Francisco, in hopes of minimizing consumption by youth and minorities.
The question: Do you think if this proposal was passed, the industry would just come up with new products that are legal and target youth populations?

Is this proposed ban on menthol cigarettes and flavored tobacco products restricting the rights of the industry as well as the rights of the people who choose to buy them? Or do the health risks surpass the right to buy and sell these products?

The question: Do you think if this proposal was passed, the industry would just come up with new products that are legal and target youth populations?

Is this proposed ban on menthol cigarettes and flavored tobacco products restricting the rights of the industry as well as the rights of the people who choose to buy them? Or do the health risks surpass the right to buy and sell these products?

Explanation / Answer

1. ANS: The FDA banned “characterizing flavors,” such as candy, fruit and chocolate, in cigarettes. But, faced with tobacco industry lobbying, it stopped short of prohibiting menthol in cigarettes or flavorings in other tobacco-related products such as e-cigarettes, little cigars and smokeless tobacco.

The FDA had banned menthol and other flavorings products for years. This ordinance didn’t happen overnight. It’s been a very long process and part of that has been gathering evidence about the role of menthol in hooking kids at a very early age and the tobacco industry knowing that it has the ability to do that by manipulating the levels of menthol in their products.”

The San Francisco ordinance is approved by federal legislation that authorized the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, it clearly monitor and regulate tobacco products. So the industry come up with new products is mostly not possible because the legislation authored with a full restriction on the sale of all flavored tobacco products.

2. ANS:

According to the Department of Public Health, the U.S government first concern about public health later it will prefer the products restricting rights of the industry and rights of the people who choose to buy products.

Menthol is believed to make the harmful chemicals contained in cigarettes more easily absorbed by the body, and some research shows that menthol cigarettes are more addictive than regular ones, according to the CDC.

Public health experts say restricting menthol and other flavored tobacco would improve health outcomes not only for the minority populations but also for teens.

Supervisor Malia Cohen, sponsor of the proposed ordinance. The proposed ordinance is designed to address two major groups, youth and minorities, who have been targeted in successful, well-financed advertising campaigns that promote menthol cigarettes and flavored non-cigarette tobacco products.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

---

---

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.