Two methods for determining Hg in coal fly ash using atomic absorption were used
ID: 787170 • Letter: T
Question
Two methods for determining Hg in coal fly ash using atomic absorption were used to see if both methods would give the same results. In the first method only HNO3 is used for digestion, while in the second method a mixture of HNO3 and HCl is used. The following concentrations of Hg (in ppb) are determined by analyzing a standard multiple times.
Concentrations (HNO3 only): 161 165 160 167 166
Concentrations (HNO3 and HCl): 159 145 140 147 143 156
Determine whether there is any significant difference between methods at a 95% confidence level.
Explanation / Answer
No. of tests are different in each case.
We use t-test to propose the existence of a significant difference between methods, if any.
Mean when only HNO3 is used = 163.8
SD in this case s1 = 3.1145
Mean in case 2 = 148.33
SD in this case S2 = 7.528
Pooled estimate, S = [(4*3.1145^2 + 5*7.528^2)/(5+6-2)]^(0.5) = 5.983
t-value of the data given = |x2-x1|/S(1/n1 + 1/n2)^(0.5) = (163.8 - 148.33)/5.983*(1/5+1/6)^(0.5) = 4.2700
Consulting t-table for 9 degrees of freedom,
t at 5% sig. = 2.262
t at 1% sig. level = 3.250
Since 2.262 < 4.270 there is a significant difference between the two methods used. and measures must be taken to find out the errors arising from either of the tests
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.