Solution 2 Compound Experimental distance Theoretical distance Prediction accura
ID: 700706 • Letter: S
Question
Solution 2
Compound
Experimental distance
Theoretical distance
Prediction accurate?
LiF
2.01
2.09
No
NaCl
2.82
2.83
Yes
KBr
3.30
3.34
Yes
RbI
3.67
3.72
No
Solution 3
Compound
Theoretical distance (Using bonding atomic radii)
Theoretical distance (Using ionic radii)
Difference
LiF
1.34+0.71 = 2.05
2.09
0.04
NaCl
1.54+0.99 = 2.53
2.83
0.30
KBr
1.96+1.14 = 3.10
3.34
0.24
RbI
2.11+1.33 = 3.44
3.72
0.28
Comparing the two methods
Compound
Difference (Bonding radii)
Difference (ionic radii)
More accurate?
LiF
0.04
0.08
Bonding radii
NaCl
0.29
0.01
Ionic radii
KBr
0.20
0.04
Ionic radii
RbI
0.23
0.05
Ionic radii
From the data, we can see that the atomic bonding radii method is more accurate for smaller compounds. This is because the ionic character of a small compound like LiF is dominated by its covalent character. Hence, bond length calculations involving ionic radii for LiF are less accurate.
Compound
Experimental distance
Theoretical distance
Prediction accurate?
LiF
2.01
2.09
No
NaCl
2.82
2.83
Yes
KBr
3.30
3.34
Yes
RbI
3.67
3.72
No
Explanation / Answer
I need help with question 2 and 3 please.
The answer to number 1 is
here's the question if you need to see it also.
And table used in book is
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.