So, I am doing a presentation on Darwins theory of evolution. The main topic bei

Question

So, I am doing a presentation on Darwins theory of evolution. The main topic being: past scientific theories, philosophers, or just idea's that seem to CHALLENGE Darwins theory on a SCIENTIFIC basis. I've done a lot of research but it's hard to find ideas that support this because evolution has obviously been proven 99.9% true, so most information supports the science behind his theory rather than oppose it. If someone can give me some names of well-known scientists, philosophers, philosophies, theories, or anything that backs up this argument up on a scientific basis, even if it is looked at as rediculous and not true, anything will help! Thank you!

Explanation / Answer

Following are the theories which support the above statement of challenges to darwin theory:

panspermia theory by Hoyle and Wickramasinghe

Michael Behe (1996) completely undercuts the Darwinists by demonstrating that they have been working on the wrong level ever since Darwin made his scientific observations, and even the neo-Darwinistreorganization of evolution science in the 1950s missed the boat entirely

Behe introduces his concept of "irreducible complexity", asserting that the molecular structures he describes simply could not work if any part of them were missing or even imperfect in its design.
Irreducible Complexity: The Challenge to the Darwinian Evolutionary Explanations of many Biochemical Structures by Katz.

Gaia Hypothesis, for example, James Lovelock and Lynn Margulis had all the Earth’s species, by means of their biological activity, engineering their environment so as to advance "evolution".

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.