Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Q3. Read the article posted at: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2

ID: 50462 • Letter: Q

Question

Q3. Read the article posted at:     http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2515969

This article describes a new hypothesis that has been in the press regarding human evolutionary origins. It is ridiculous and stupid and unfortunately is not a prank on the gullible and credulous media, it's the ravings of a delusional man.

(a) What evolutionary concept is Dr. McCarthy apparently unaware of?

(b) Describe some fossil evidence that directly disproves his crazy idea.

(c) Describe a molecular approach that would create data that would disprove his crazy idea

Explanation / Answer

Answer) in this article, a new hypothesis regarding human evolutionary origin is proposed.

a) Dr. McCarthy apparently is unaware of the evolutionary concept about Homoplasy and the convergent evolution.

(b) None of the evidence on our fossil ancestors shows half-pig like features and t directly disproves his crazy idea.

(c) Establishing the molecular phylogeny would disprove his crazy idea. molecular phylogeny would allow placing the pigs and humans clearly on two different clusters.