Assume the company you work for practices strict adherence to the law in its rel
ID: 471037 • Letter: A
Question
Assume the company you work for practices strict adherence to the law in its relationships with employees and job applicants. The company calls it staffing by the book. But beyond that, it feels that anything goes in terms of tolerated staffing practices. What is your assessment of this approach? Compare and contrast the employment relationship between employer-employee, independent contractors, and temporary employees. Assume the company you work for practices strict adherence to the law in its relationships with employees and job applicants. The company calls it staffing by the book. But beyond that, it feels that anything goes in terms of tolerated staffing practices. What is your assessment of this approach? Compare and contrast the employment relationship between employer-employee, independent contractors, and temporary employees.Explanation / Answer
Strict adherence is somewhat necessary in the business world. In a employer-employee relationship, this approach must be taken with caution because of the orgizational block it can create, more specifically the organizational block of "Strict line of command", where it is an unintended consequence. For independent contractors, strict adherence is more necessary since contracts require more legal aspects. For temporary employees, strict adherence is not required at all since there is no need to commit on these employees.
I'm currently interning at E&Y. Shoot me a message if you need more help.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.