Capacity Cutdown at Chrysler Robert Nardelli, the former CEO of Chrysler oncutti

Question

Capacity Cutdown at Chrysler Robert Nardelli, the former CEO of Chrysler oncutting 35,000 jobs in order to save his company during the financial crisis: I signed on as Chrysler CEO in July 2007. Theindustry was robust, but the brand had lost its identity. The first six monthswere great. We rebuilt the brand, disentangled it from Daimler, pruned theproduct line. Then came the financial crisis. The first thing we lost wasleasing; 20 percent of our business disappeared overnight. Then the fleetbusiness went away, and financing for new car purchases dried up. It soon became clear that we were in a battle tosurvive. We cut $5 billion in costs and brought the capacity down by 1.4million units. It wasn’t enough. The toughest decision I had to make was reducing theworkforce by 35,000 people. We desperately needed to preserve cash to keep thesupply chain intact. We could have sold assets or furloughed union employees,but because of contractual obligations neither of those options would have madeus cash-positive. I had no choice but to cut staff. It was traumaticreleasing them into an economy where it wouldn’t be easy to find another job. Ihad to lay off 5,000 salaried people the Wednesday before Thanksgiving. Iremember going into a large staff meeting and seeing that the crowd in theauditorium was half what it had been when I started as CEO. It was such ahaunting visual. The union was on board. We all recognized that wewere one step away from cataclysm. The UAW didn’t roll over, but it recognizedthat we were in it together. If we hadn’t made layoffs, we would not havegotten the first $4billion from the government. Every supplier would have feltthe domino effect. The 10 percent unemployment rate is misleading. Thereal figure is closer to 18 percent. Unless this country creates 150,000 newjobs every month for the next four years, we won’t get back to where we were in2007. We need specific programs built to create new jobs-real jobs, not censusjobs, not seasonal jobs. As gut-wrenching as my decision was, it was criticalto saving the company. A lot of families made big sacrifices for Chrysler, andI will never forget that.

Question 1: In strategic capacity planning, what other capital intensive resources should Robert Nardelli cut aswell as reducing labor force?

Question 2: If you were Robert Nardelli,what would you do to maintain a stable relationship with suppliers and avoid the domino effect?

Explanation / Answer

1) The other capital intensive resources that Robert Nardelli should reduce along with the labor force include facilities , equipment etc.

2) In order to maintain a stable relationship with the suppliers and to reduce the domino effect the production capacity should not be reduced drastically but it should be done in stages to reduce the impact on the suppliers. Also the prior order committments made to the suppliers should be honoured and at no stage Robery Nardelli should withdraw the order committments made to the supplier. Similarly any payment committments made to the suppliers should also be honoured which will help to reduce the domino effect it not completely avoided and will help to maintain a stable relationship .

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.