Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Susie sues ABC Corporation, DEF Corporation and GHI Corporation. She wins a judg

ID: 461613 • Letter: S

Question

Susie sues ABC Corporation, DEF Corporation and GHI Corporation. She wins a judgment of $1,000, 000. The jury finds that while the defendants were liable, Susie was also at fault and assigns her 70% of the liability and each defendant 10%. If Susie lived in state with "pure" comparative negligence she could recover: $700, 000 $300, 000 $900, 000 $0 she may not recover anything Referring to Question 11, if Susie lived in a state with regular comparative negligence she could recover: $700, 000 $300, 000 $900, 000 $0 she may not recover anything

Explanation / Answer

If susie acted in a complete negelegence, she would have not earned any compensation because every person should discharge their duties deligently and in a prudent manner while contracting and dealing with the parties.

Hence the answer will be D.

2) if she would have acted in a comparitive neglegence the she would have earned a compensation of 10% from each party i.e 3*10%*1000000 = $300000