VIVLINE DISCUSSION IN ORDER OBTAIN CREDIT FOR THIS DISCUSSIONIT MUST BE SUBMITTE
ID: 459386 • Letter: V
Question
VIVLINE DISCUSSION IN ORDER OBTAIN CREDIT FOR THIS DISCUSSIONIT MUST BE SUBMITTED ONLINE INTO DISCUSSIONS TO , " LOCATED coURSE PAGE, UNDER COMMUNICATION AT TOP OF THE ONLINE NO LATER THAN SATURDAY, JUNE 4. This assignment is worth a maximum of twenty points. After reading Chapter 2, prepare your answer to the following, in a wORD document, and submit online into the D21 Discussion -Discussion on Court procedures -- Alfonso's vs Roberto's Note: To submit your answer, click on Start a New Thread. Enter a subject tile of your own, cut & paste your answer into the box provided, and Post. Then, you will be able to read your classmates's online submissions. Please reply to at least two of your classmates, to complete this discussion assignment Discussion on Court procedures - Alfonso's vs Roberto's Alfonso's Cuisine is a lunch-cart business. It occupies a street corner in Texarkana, a city that straddles the border of Arkansas and Texas. Across the street -- and across the state line, which runs down the middle of the street - is Roberto's Tacos. The two businesses compete for customers. Recently, Alfonso has begun to suspect that Roberto's is engaging in competitive behavior that is illegal. Alfonsos manager overheard several of Roberto's employees discussing these illegal competitive tactics while on a break at a nearby Starbucks. Alfonso files a lawsuit against Roberto's in a federal court based upon diversity jurisdiction. 1). Discuss whether or not Roberto's has a basis to file a motion claiming that the federal court lacks just dis its It 2.) Assume that this case goes to trial. At the end of the trial, the jury decides against Alfonso, and the judge issues a ruling in favor of Roberto's. Alfonso believes, however, that it has both the law and the facts on its side. If Alfonso is unwilling to accept the result of the trial, what are its options? 3.) Discuss whether Alfonso's manager should be able to testify at trial about what he heard some of Roberto's employees say to one another while at a coffee shop. Why would the admissibility of hearsay evidence be potentially unethical?Explanation / Answer
1)
Answer Roberto's has a basis to file a motion clamming to federal court .Because law of equality is applicable to both parties.Alfonso has filed a case on Roberto's , in this case Robertos can also mention his option or can file a case.
2)
Answer Alfonso dont have any option other than to accept the courts judgement.Now in this case if Alfonso feels that all the documents , evidences he has against the Robertos are correct , then he can go to the next court & can file a case .Still he has option to a file a case in next level of court
3)
Answer
Alfonso manager what he heard about the employee talking near to the coffee shop , this may not be correct evidence .This can only be taken as reference. Yes I am absolutely agree with the statement ,this may be unethical. For this a counter mechanisms or some new approach is important that can help Alfonso to have a better evidence to make available in front of court or juridical system.
Here though its been heard by Alfonoso manager still its not the strong evidence unless & until it is captured.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.