Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

21. Ronald developed a new type of Flashlight, which he named MaxiBeam. He also

ID: 450027 • Letter: 2

Question

21. Ronald developed a new type of Flashlight, which he named MaxiBeam. He also wrote an operating manual to be included with each device. Ronald could obtain trademark protection for

A. the operating manual only.

B. the name, but only for a device of the type Ronald developed.

C. the device, the name, and the operating manual.

D. the device only.

22. Donald contracted to sell a plot of land to Build-Um, Inc. for $400,000. Donald breached the contract and Build-Um sued him. The reasonable market value of the property at the time of the breach was $650,000. Build-Um can recover:

A. $250,000

B. nothing, because specific performance is his only remedy here

C. the entire $400,000 D. nothing, for he hasn't really suffered any harm

E. None of the above is correct

Explanation / Answer

21 . Ronald developed a new type of Flashlight, which he named MaxiBeam. He also wrote an operating manual to be included with each device. Ronald could obtain trademark protection for

A. the operating manual only.

B. the name, but only for a device of the type Ronald developed.

C. the device, the name, and the operating manual.

D. the device only.

Answer :

C. the device, the name, and the operating manual.

Here in this case  Ronald developed a new flash light .So definitely he will apply for trademark for Device , Name , Operating manual all of the three.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

22. Donald contracted to sell a plot of land to Build-Um, Inc. for $400,000. Donald breached the contract and Build-Um sued him. The reasonable market value of the property at the time of the breach was $650,000. Build-Um can recover:

A. $250,000

B. nothing, because specific performance is his only remedy here

C. the entire $400,000 D. nothing, for he hasn't really suffered any harm

E. None of the above is correct

Answer : b)

nothing, because specific performance is his only remedy here

Its totally depend on the contract specification , that what exactly mentioned in contract between Donald to sell a & Build-Um, Inc.

That leads to decide where penalty has to take from Donaldo or not.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote