Do you agree to this? State your reasons to support your decision. In Milton Fri

Question

Do you agree to this? State your reasons to support your decision.

In Milton Friedman's controversial thesis that the social responsibly of business is to increase profits. However, this week, we know more about Rawls' view over the obligations to future generations. The most essential question we need to ask our self is do we have the responsibility to take control over the future environment? Before we answer this question, we need to be aware of the fact that corporations are playing the major role here. According to Friedman's point of view, he will only focuses on the shorterms, which is to increase profits and worry about whether or not the company makes enough profits to stockholders. Thus, Friedman will thinks that it's okay to destroy the environments in order to increase more profits. However, if we're all practicing this notion, what will be left in the future? Maybe not even 200 years later, the environment is already been dis-functional. Then, we will have nothing left, not even the profits that we were trying to generate 200 years ago. The idea of profits come first is horrible. Can you survive if you're getting 10, 20 percents less from profits? Yes! Now, can you survive when all of the living environment are gone? No more clean water, no more trees. Maybe not... It is important for us to leave some kind of decent environments to later generations. Perhaps there's a after life, and we all will just be returning to the same place where we were all belong to. Who knows?

Explanation / Answer

Well , I am so much agree for aforesaid case;

We have no control on future but we can make our futuresafe and secure from today's acticity or working styles.

First of all corporation is playing a very vital role to demolishing the environment because in today's era development is making in the name of demolishing trees making ways, making metros underground by underground drilling somewhere its is developing the country.

But somewhere we excavating our own graves which is true but in way of making money and profits everybody is slowly slowly erasing from their minds.The most frequent way of coming earthquakes are drilling or cutting the mountains for the railway tunnels or for metro or underground pasing ways.

Everybody has to go inside earth as per differrent religion views, but we live more years if we not demolish the trees, mountains, rivers in shake of our feasibility.

Friedman is saying that for short term profit we can destroy environment, but it is not true or good to think like this because destroying environment we can live 200 years or 400years but after where we go thereafter when whole world will get demolished or destroyed.

We have to make profits but we will have to be in limits not go against the nature.

and in last everybody have to face and pay what he has done in the world so we have to prepare for that , because in last everything money, buildings, metros, plane anything will not go to place where we have to go after death.

So it is clear

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse D
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.