Anthony Caruso lived in Mohican Historic Hous- ing from 1998 to 2001, when he di

Question

   Anthony Caruso lived in Mohican Historic Hous- ing from 1998 to 2001, when he died. The Mohican Historic Housing Association was aware Margher- ita Del Core was Caruso’s next of kin, his sister. Although Mohican had been informed that Del Core was Caruso’s next of kin, it did not respond to efforts by the hospital to obtain that information after his death. In the absence of that information, the hospital arranged for Caruso’s burial in a pau- per’s grave. Four months later, Mohican informed Del Core of the death. Del Core filed suit against Mohican for, among other things, inflicting extreme emotional distress upon her by not informing her in a timely manner about her brother’s death so that she could have arranged a proper funeral. The trial court granted Mohican’s motion to dismiss, and Del Core appealed. Is Mohican liable for an intentional infliction of emotional distress? Should Mohican have informed Del Core sooner regarding her brother’s death? [Del Core v. Mohican Historic Housing Assocs., 81 Conn. App. 120 (2004).]

Explanation / Answer

It is the basic fundamentals to determine that the complaints which have been filled in the court have sufficient allegations. It is the moral responsibility of the court to determine whether the complaint filled by the person have a sufficient cause or not. The defendant should asked the court to reject he petition because cause of complaint is not sufficient. The defendant should prove in the court that petitioner is not a legal relatives of the Anthony Caruso. The defendant should go to the court due to the facts of emotional distress.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse A
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.