Some contemporary observers, commenting on the onset of the Civil War, thought t

Question

Some contemporary observers, commenting on the onset of the Civil War, thought that the conflict between the North and South was the work of "fanatical agitators.” Secretary of State William H. Seward was of a different mind, however. In his view, the causes of the Civil War ran much deeper. Seward believed it was "...an irrepressible conflict between opposing and enduring forces.”

Which of these views do you think describes the sectional divisions that occurred in the United States, and that led to the Civil War, is the more accurate? Support your point of view

Explanation / Answer

Seward views regarding civil war is more accurate.He believed that civil war is an irresponsible conflict between opposing and enduring forces.It was like criminally stupid because there are unnecessary argument between arrogant extremists and politicians. It was the conflict between northern states and southern states of United States. It's because northern states put more tightly restraints upon slavery but southern states states were opposing this as they thought it would lead to go there votes worthless.The other reasons are slavery and political and cultural differences. This civil war also called War between the states.Northern and southern are different in almost every way.The main aim of civil of civil war is to end the slavery.There may have been other means to achieve this.There would have been no war if either side understood this.In the end, America would have transformed but not in the way expected.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse S
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.