Doesn’t the term free exercise of religion imply the right to engage in behavior
ID: 434932 • Letter: D
Question
Doesn’t the term free exercise of religion imply the right to engage in behavior that society considers to be unconventional or even immoral, as long as the conduct is engaged in freely and is based on sincere religious beliefs? Explain your answer. Doesn’t the term free exercise of religion imply the right to engage in behavior that society considers to be unconventional or even immoral, as long as the conduct is engaged in freely and is based on sincere religious beliefs? Explain your answer. Doesn’t the term free exercise of religion imply the right to engage in behavior that society considers to be unconventional or even immoral, as long as the conduct is engaged in freely and is based on sincere religious beliefs? Explain your answer.Explanation / Answer
Even if the conduct is based on sincere religious beliefs, it should not be a deterrent to state interests. Free exercise of religion is allowed as long as the society is not impacted harmfully because of the religious practices. For example, even though some religions believe in human sacrifice, it is illegal to perform such an act. Such blatant practices even though are religious will not be protected by law. The freedom to believe is absolute. However, the freedom to act on those beliefs is not absolute. People are restricted on how far they can practice their religious beliefs. So, though the religious behavior is unconventional or immoral, it is permitted as long as it does not break the law.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.