Read this three article do a essay with below requirement 5 paragraph) Hi read t
ID: 415449 • Letter: R
Question
Read this three article do a essay with below requirement 5 paragraph)
Hi read this three journal article and write a report Pros and cons of Online Focus group.
Maximum of 1000-1250words comprise of
Paragraph 1 : introduction (200-250 words maximum)
Paragraph 2 : 1st journal article (200-250words)
Paragraph 3: 2nd journal article (200-250 words )
Paragraph 4: 3rd journal article (200-250words)
Paragraph 5: conclusion (200-250words )
this three article
1)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wdrj67CPoX3ez7OBp5tzqURI2zF_S-hE
2)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1J5QatLVD8cFWJcQOEaD81gmO5K4KReq2
3)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1iB4yGCrJi8a0Om3dtx3k88iqOkaccBoU
Requirement is below
1.Introduction (200-250 words):
Provide an outline of the research topic
Definition of online focus group
•Justify the selection of the articles
•Why did you select these 3 articles? Are they peer reviewed? Do they have similar context/background/research area?
•
•Briefly explain how each article covers the research topic.
•How are these articles relevant to the topic: Online focus group? Are they looking at Online focus group the same way? Did they define “Online focus group” the same way?
Each entry must have the following:
a)Summary
•Explain the main idea of the article: Pros and Cons of online focus group
b) Evaluation
•Evaluates the credibility, limitations of the article, objectivity &/or bias.
•
c) Reflection
•Summarises how the article help you with the understanding of the research topic
Conclusion:
•Provide a summary of the insights gained
•Compare and contrast the findings from the 3 articles)
Explanation / Answer
Introduction- There are two fundamental information accumulation techniques utilized as a part of statistical surveying: quantitative and qualitative. Quantitative research is utilized when scientists utilize indistinguishable inquiries and organized reaction choices normally gathered in numerical shape from bigger, more illustrative examples and subjected to experimental examination. Qualitative research, then again, includes gathering information from free-design reactions evoked by open-finished reactions to inside and out examining and qualitative perception. Qualitative research is frequently used to gauge such things as encounters, feelings, sentiments, and other non-quantifiable information. The most famous type of qualitative research is the focus group.
Definition- The goal of focus group research is to learn and understand what people have to say and why. The emphasis is on getting people to talk at length and in detail about the subject at hand. The intent is to find out how they feel about a product, concept, idea, or organization; how it fits in their lives; and their emotional involvement with it.
Pros- • Allows for more in-depth conversations
• Cost effective
• Great solution for fast turnaround projects
• Accessible
• Available in any language
• Virtual is the new way of communication
• Especially with younger populations
Cons- .A major disadvantage of a focus group is that it the survey results may not fully represent the opinion of the larger target population.
. In addition, the facilitator must be well-trained to handle any situation that may arise from the focus group interaction.
.The level of involvement that some participants may have could be minimal. Sometimes people don’t interact in a focus group at all.
.Many focus groups try to eliminate distractions that may occur. Although this is a concern, a greater issue is security.
Technology and method intersect in online focus group
Focus groups are a well-established qualitative research methodology that have become increasingly popular among social researchers over the last few decades. Their popularity is tied to their ability to use group interactions to elicit detailed responses, which have been shaped as much by social cues as by the individual’s own beliefs and perceptions. However, traditional face-to-face focus groups have some disadvantages, particularly when dealing with hard-to-reach or geographically dispersed populations and sensitive topics. Increasingly, the Internet offers a real alternative to face-to-face groups as technology improves and connection spreads. Online focus groups therefore have the potential to address this gap while also offering researchers the opportunity to avoid the costs of finding an ideal location to host their groups.
Online face book focus group research
In 2014, Face book claimed to have over 1.23 billion users worldwide, representing a large portion of the global population engaging in one way or another with social media and making the world become more connected. The popularity of Face book opened the opportunity for us as researchers to use this platform for conducting the online focus groups. Other social media platforms do not have such a broad reach and are less popular with the target population of our study. To become a Face book user is quite easy requiring only two steps: (i) sign-up and (ii) provide a valid e-mail address or phone number for activation. Face book could at once connect both globally and locally, connecting people who are geographically apart while at the same time also allowing for dense interaction in local or small communities. Furthermore, in order to join others on the Face book platform, users need to accept the friend request from another user and become a member of her or his friendship circle. Once a friend, all parties can view each other’s comments and time line as well as news feeds from any other members connected within the friendship circle. Communication within the Face book special interest group is promoted through the “newsfeeds” posted by the facilitator and/or members and a “message” system that allows for private communication between members and the facilitator. Members could also choose to leave the special interest group at any time.
A comparison between face to face and online discussion group about HIV AIDS
While face-to-face and online groups provide support, encouragement and information to their members, a number of distinct differences have emerged. Some of the obvious differences have already been mentioned. Time, space and geographic boundaries restrict face-to-face groups. Membership in online groups, on the other hand, may be unlimited and not contained by international boundaries. Availability 24 h a day, 7 days a week makes online support convenient and accessible at user discretion. Gender differences exist as well. Research suggests that men use computer-mediated support more frequently than they use face-to-face support groups. Comfort with using computer technology coupled with the anonymity that the computer provides may encourage men to participate online more freely, especially when talking about sensitive issues like depression or suicide. Online support groups may provide a cost-effective means of providing support, encouragement and health information to a large number of people. Online support groups have potential for reaching population groups which previously may have been unreached or difficult to reach by health education. The proliferation of these online communities will provide new challenges for health educators to tailor messages and utilize these forums for educational activities. Continued research is needed to further examine the role of the online support groups in increasing patient satisfaction, compliance with medical regimen, achievement of desired health outcomes and use of online support groups as an educational venue.
Conclusion- Online focus group will without a doubt turn into a suitable component of the qualitative specialist's tool compartment. Care must be taken in uniting members who are able to do serenely taking part in an electronic medium, that is, people who as of now have a comfort level with innovation. Along these lines, people will have the capacity to contribute and communicate in the electronic focus assemble openly and obviously, bringing about their best commitment. Care should likewise be taken that the focus bunch is led and encouraged in an expert and proficient way. In light of these impediments, one must make the inquiry: is gathering research utilizing the Internet a feasible research device? Maybe the reality of the situation will become obvious eventually, yet I trust that as paces of association enhance, access to the Internet turns out to be more widespread, and data transmission grows keeping in mind the end goal to take into account higher quality video imaging, the potential for directing focus aggregate meetings and discourses online will turn into a more powerful instrument for leading qualitative research. Meanwhile, analysts must be careful about utilizing the Internet as a vehicle of request, and know its restrictions, and in addition it's potential focal points. The discoveries demonstrate that online focus assemble philosophy is a possible apparatus for gathering qualitative information inside the setting of pediatric oncology, and may offer new chances to gather information in other difficult to-incorporate populations.
I answered this question before although I add the conclusion part in this answer. thankyou.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.