Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

Read the text and answer the case study. INDIVIDUAL PROJECT FINAL ASSIGNMENT (30

ID: 413165 • Letter: R

Question

Read the text and answer the case study.

INDIVIDUAL PROJECT FINAL ASSIGNMENT (30% of marks) You are required to submit an essay written in a scholarly manner that examines the following case and questions: Case: Two Cheers for Sweatshops Iheyre airty ana aangerous. Iheyre also a major reason Asia is back on rack. By NICHOLAS D. KRISTOF AND SHERYL WUDUNN It was breakfast time, and the food stand in the village in northeastern Thailand was crowded. Maesubin Sisopha. the middle-aged woman cooking the food, was friendly her portions large and the price right. For the equivalent of about 5 cents, she offered a huge green mango leaf filled with rice, fish paste and fried beetles. It was a hearty breakfast, if one didn't mind the odd antenna left sticking in one's teeth. One of the half-dozen men and women sitting on a bench eating was a sinewy, bare- chested laborer in his late 30's named Mongkol Latlakorn. It was a hot, lazy day, and so we started chatting idly about the food and, eventually, our families. Mongkol mentioned that his daughter, Darin, was 15, and his voice softened as he spoke of her. She was beautiful and smart, and her father's hopes rested on her "Is she in school?" we asked. "Oh, no," Mongkol said, his eyes sparkling with amusement. "She's working in a factory in Bangkok. She's making clothing for export to America." He explained that she was paid $2 a day for a nine-hour shift, six days a week. "It's dangerous work," Mongkol added. "Twice the needles went right through her hands. But the managers bandaged up her hands, and both times she got better again and went back to work."

Explanation / Answer

The international Labour right forum define sweet shops as the organization which violates Labour laws (2013). These are violations related to working hours, wages, safety conditions and disciplinary methods.

as an organization that violates two or more labor laws (2013). The workers in sweatshops are treated in an inappropriate manner wherein they are beaten, tortured and harassed even sexually (Australian Broadcast Network 2013). The arguments that defend the sweatshops reveal that they benefit in the long run instead of harming. The major argument against sweatshops is that they do exploitation against the workers (Shaw et.al 2013, p207). Especially the cases in the third world countries have low wage rates for the same job that is paid more in home countries.

There is as argument that the workers if sweatshops are stuck in a cycle of poverty because of exploitation. There is no access to health care, expenses and shelter. The ethics of Kant justify the wages of sweatshops do not pay attention to human divinity and human (kant1971, p273). According to Kant it is important that human beings are treated as to means to end but their treatment is as end itself which is not right (Kant 1971,p273).

There is reformulation and changes in the organizations to make sure that these issues are addressed effectively and they do not have negative reputation. According to the argument set by the companies who support sweatshops it is asserted that they help for increasing the productivity and manufacturing flexibilities (Arnold & Bowie 2003, p223).

The organizations focus on maximizing profitability. According to the argument of matt Zwolenski sweatshops are able to help the poor to get rid of their poverty and the third world countries workers find it as the best option.

The workers are stuck in the cycle of poverty and they are not provided with adequate options to get out of it. Sweatshops have terrible work conditions with no access to basic Healthcare and shelter. It does not improve their present working conditions. In fact the improper working conditions and sometimes abuse that takes place at the sweatshops worsens their conditions. It does not help them at all. It is an unfair method and the Labour practices are not fair.

The recommendations are to come up with effective public policies that do not allow companies to indulge in sweatshops with improper work conditions. It should severely punish the ones who do it and there should be an appropriate way to implement the same.