read the 3 article and do a essay 1)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wdrj67CPoX
ID: 412750 • Letter: R
Question
read the 3 article and do a essay
1)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1wdrj67CPoX3ez7OBp5tzqURI2zF_S-hE
2)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1J5QatLVD8cFWJcQOEaD81gmO5K4KReq2
3)https://drive.google.com/open?id=1iB4yGCrJi8a0Om3dtx3k88iqOkaccBoU
a3.pdf
drive.google.com
a2.pdf
drive.google.com
a1.pdf
drive.google.com
Pros and cons of Online Focus group.
Maximum of 1000-1250 words, comprised of;
Introduction (200-250 words maximum)
Article annotations (3 x 200-250 words maximum each)
Conclusion (200-250 words maximum)
1.Introduction (200-250 words):
Provide an outline of the research topic
Definition of online focus group
•Justify the selection of the articles
•Why did you select these 3 articles? Are they peer reviewed? Do they have similar context/background/research area?
•
•Briefly explain how each article covers the research topic.
•How are these articles relevant to the topic: Online focus group? Are they looking at Online focus group the same way? Did they define “Online focus group” the same way?
Each entry must have the following:
a)Summary
•Explain the main idea of the article: Pros and Cons of online focus group
b) Evaluation
•Evaluates the credibility, limitations of the article, objectivity &/or bias.
•
c) Reflection
•Summarises how the article help you with the understanding of the research topic
Conclusion:
•Provide a summary of the insights gained
•Compare and contrast the findings from the 3 articles)
Pros and cons of Online Focus group.
Maximum of 1000-1250 words, comprised of;
Introduction (200-250 words maximum)
Article annotations (3 x 200-250 words maximum each)
Conclusion (200-250 words maximum)
1.Introduction (200-250 words):
Provide an outline of the research topic
Definition of online focus group
•Justify the selection of the articles
•Why did you select these 3 articles? Are they peer reviewed? Do they have similar context/background/research area?
•
•Briefly explain how each article covers the research topic.
•How are these articles relevant to the topic: Online focus group? Are they looking at Online focus group the same way? Did they define “Online focus group” the same way?
Each entry must have the following:
a)Summary
•Explain the main idea of the article: Pros and Cons of online focus group
b) Evaluation
•Evaluates the credibility, limitations of the article, objectivity &/or bias.
•
c) Reflection
•Summarises how the article help you with the understanding of the research topic
Conclusion:
•Provide a summary of the insights gained
•Compare and contrast the findings from the 3 articles)
Pros and cons of Online Focus group.
Maximum of 1000-1250 words, comprised of;
Introduction (200-250 words maximum)
Article annotations (3 x 200-250 words maximum each)
Conclusion (200-250 words maximum)
1.Introduction (200-250 words):
Provide an outline of the research topic
Definition of online focus group
•Justify the selection of the articles
•Why did you select these 3 articles? Are they peer reviewed? Do they have similar context/background/research area?
•
a3.pdf
drive.google.com
International Journal of Qualitative Methods 5 (3) September2006 The Influence of Setting on Findings Produced in Qualitative Health Research: A Comparison between Face-to-Face and Online Discussion Groups about HIV/AIDS Guendalina Graffigna A. C. Bosio Guendalina Graffigna, PhD candidate in Psychology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore di Milano, ItalyExplanation / Answer
Online focus group- With the focus group method, the members can share normal qualities preceding their investment, and accordingly enable the discourse to continue normally furthermore, without trouble. There is generally no wavering with respect to the members to impart their insights and thoughts. They can interface with each other and take prompts from other group individuals sharing regular encounters and additionally those that vary. The online focus group is a method for social occasion assessments that does not necessitate members being in a similar area, rather members go into an online website where they read and react to a mediator's inquiries and those remarks and inquiries posted by different members. Online focus assemble look into is in its preparatory stages in the sociologies, and constrained research exists estimating the viability of the method. Scientists are starting to investigate the probability that utilizing offbeat and synchronous innovations can enlarge the advantages of focus group methods.
Advantages-
Disadvantages-
Online face book focus group research- The prominence of Face book opened the open door for scientists to utilize this stage for leading the online concentration gatherings. Other web-based social networking stages don't have such a wide reach and are less prominent with the objective populace of our examination. To end up plainly a Face book client is very simple requiring just two stages: (I) join and (ii) give a substantial email address or telephone number for enactment. Face book could without a moment's delay interface both internationally and locally associating individuals who are topographically separated while in the meantime additionally taking into consideration thick connection in neighbourhood or little groups. Moreover, with a specific end goal to go along with others on the Facebook stage, clients need to acknowledge the companion ask for from another client and turn into an individual from her or his fellowship circle. Once a companion, all gatherings can see each other's remarks and course of events and in addition news bolsters from some other individuals associated inside the fellowship circle. The client's status on Face book is unknown rather than mysterious and takes into account checking the credibility and part personality. On account of its notoriety and straightforward entry, we utilized Face book for the online concentration bunches rather than any of the other web-based social networking stages that did not have such a wide reach all inclusive.
Face book additionally takes into account the development of specific vested parties. Any Face book client can start a Face book intrigue gathering to collaborate with different clients on an uncommon point. The initiator goes about as a facilitator and welcomes other Face book clients to join the gathering or may get demands from different clients to join a gathering. A noteworthy element of a non concurrent Face book specific vested party is that it concentrates on the clients' capacity and readiness.
Comparison between face to face and online discussion groups- In spite of the fact that the up close and personal concentration aggregate allowed us to gather a lot of verbal and nonverbal information, some basic angles became known. To start with, the without a doubt exceptional connection was predominantly explained in rotating , in this way repressing the development of a "different voices" talk. Besides, the administration of hand assuming control over the exchanges was hazardous on a few events as a result of the event of initiative marvels: In the two gatherings, a member cornered the discussion, keeping his discourse turns long and making it important for the arbitrator to mediate.
every talk bunches demonstrated impossible to miss qualities, both regarding conversational trade designs and as far as talk structure, not just ascribable to the general contrast between up close and personal and Internet-intervened cooperation. A long way from prompting an authoritative conclusion, these outcomes appear to affirm not just the speculation of a general distinction between a vis-à-vis dialog setting and an Internet interceded one yet in addition to uncover fascinating contrasts among the types of online concentration assemble considered, as far as both topical explanation of talk and conversational and social qualities of gathering trades.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.