eferences Mailings Review View Tele What Would You Do? Scenario 1: You are the f
ID: 399880 • Letter: E
Question
eferences Mailings Review View Tele What Would You Do? Scenario 1: You are the first person to arrive in your classroom and as you sit down you notice an iPod on the floor underneath the adjacent seat. You pick it up and tum it on. It works fine and even has some of your favorite music listed. You realize that you are the only one in the room and no one will know if you keep it. You see other students entering the room so you place the iPod on the floor next to your belonging. You will have the whole class period to decide what to do. 1. Scenario 2: Instead of finding the iPod, you are a friend who sits next to the person who finds it. As class begins, your friend leans over and asks your advice about what to do. 2. Scenario 3: You are now a student representative on the judicial board at school. The student who kept the iPod is accused of stealing. How would you make the decision about the situation? 3. Write a 2-3 page APA style paper discussing the following questions related to the above scenarios: What are the key facts that you should consider before making a decision, as either the person who discovered the iPod, the friend, or the judicial board member? Is this an ethical issue? What exactly are the ethical aspects involved in your decision? Who else is involved, or should be involved, in this decision? Who has a stake in the outcome? What altenatives are available to you? What are the consequences of each alternative? having a stake in the outcome? dilemma? .How would each of your alternatives affect the other people you have identified as Where might you look for additional guidance to assist you in resolving this particular Provide 3-5 APA style references both inline and at the end of the paper to support your analysis. Please write in 3rd person. Please include citations to support your ideas.Explanation / Answer
A Personal system of values and ethics which serves as a personal guide and decision making tool in all decisions as well as, responses and behaviours in personal as well as professional life, is usually variable and adaptable. Many of the deep rooted values inculcated during childhood may become habits and reflexes, which begin to operate at an unconscious level. Earlier when society and the world at large were mostly closed places for most of the population, a large percentage not even having travelled to the neighbouring City, the moral values and ethics prevaling within a certain society and culture received natural protection, resulting from such segregation and isolation. With unprecedented advancement in technology cultures and societies across the globe have mingled like never before. This has necessitated cross referencing of values and ethics which prevail across societies in different countries and continents. This intermingling has resulted in Greater awareness becoming a basis for questioning existing value system and adopting the best system across the world which may be suitable for an individual. It also essentially has forced people to become more adaptable and flexible in their approach leading to ease of change in values, thinking and behaviours. With the globalisation of the economy an individual is required to work in global organisations with Value systems and cultures which may be foreign to the one followed by the individual. In the current scenario this has resulted in most individuals following a dual system of values one reserved for personal life and interactions and other tailored to suit the professional life. None are spared this essential adaptattion as it has become a survival and evolutionary trait for most individuals exposed to global cultures through social media interactions and employment with Global concerns.
Maintaining basic values of honesty, integrity, discipline, diligence, patriotism and compassion which are common to most cultures, on the personal front is quite easy and simple. However, in a business environment within a global organisation the very perception of certain values can differ greatly. Due to this variance in perception all values undergo certain modification with honesty as you have known it no longer having the same meaning and being open to suitable modifications and alterations which may prove beneficial to the organisation. Many values maybe similarly modifiable, thereby taking on a definition different from the one we are habituated to. It may not be entirely immoral or wrongful acts but simply in the interest of the organisation. It would be impossible for an organisation to survive without such tweaking in the current environment. The question which should be relevant for an individual, is that, how far and how much is acceptable. Once one has overcome the initial shock and internal turmoil caused due to exposure in the professional environment, to an entirely different definition of morality and values,it is essential to make certain important decisions. To undertake an extensive assessment of the personal value system involving a deep inner search of what truly matters personally to an individual, which are the values one is willing to compromise to an extent on and which are firmly not subject to any modification. Any tough situation one is faced with which involves taking a decision on an ethical basis, one should ask themselves one major question that who would be impacted by this decision, how would they be impacted and does the decision cause harm to the person or people impacted. To the current day, I have applied this simple process and can see that it has been successful because I am yet to suffer guilt pangs over any wrongful decision or act of mine which caused harm advertently or inadvertently to another.
Displaying ethical values consists of a behavioral approach or persistent characteristics of an individuals personality rather than an application to an issue or problem which may arise randomly. Numerous times within a day every individual is faced with various decisions which require choosing an option between right and wrong even right and right, where the right is grey in colour being white for some and black for others. Before making a decision a person needs to consider the impact of the decision on all stakeholders involved. With an excellent value system existing within the individual every ethical decision becomes a non decision as the person has evolved ethical expertise to a level where doing what is right for all involved stakeholders becomes habitrol and reflexive rather than a process involving thinking, analysis and decision making. In a scenario such as this as the person discovering the iPod one should consider the impact on the owner of the iPod as the sense of loss of value may be extensive foreign student for whom music is a necessity for relieving stress and survival itself. Therefore, the value of the item cannot be perceived as just being an iPod but needs to be analysed for the value it may hold for the stakeholder. It is essential that a person practice ethics in such minor situation to ensure it becomes deeply ingrained and a habit leading to ethical expertise. This would be the same advice preferred to the friend in case the person approached me for advice. As a member of the judicial board similar advice would be given to the student and the person would be asked to develop ethical judgement and decision making by becoming more empathetic as absence of empathy makes it difficult for an individual to perceive the impact of any decision on all involved stakeholders.
This is definitely an ethical issue as action result a feeling of loss, dejection, anger, stress which may lead to feelings of Revenge in youngsters. Any act of any individual which results in minimal or substantial loss to another is unethical and unjust. The act essentially negates the universal duty of care every individual pose to every other on earth. This should not be required to be implemented through legal Framework but encouraged to be adopted universally by every world citizen. It will go a long way in making the world a better place.
The direct stakeholder in the scenario may appear to be only the student who has lost the iPod but in truth there are many stakeholders involved. Incident may have Deep Impact on the student leading to permanent negative changes in behaviour and thinking which can subsequently result in substantial reduction in quality of life for the individual, for the parents and all relatives, and finally the society at large including all professional contacts and organisations. Also the person committing an unethical act, is in itself a stakeholder as the action may become a habit resulting in such behaviour being repeated throughout life leading to vast negative implications for the person themselves and everyone in contact with them including society. Another stakeholder is the Institution where such an incident takes place as a negative message on the values existing within the environment of the institution is given. An educational institution is perceived as a place for inculcating high values and ethics within students. Therefore, it can greatly harm the image of an institution.
A student representative on the judicial board, needs to ensure a strong message is sent in a soft manner to the student involved as well as all others at large. Youngsters are especially impressionable and it is even more important that every individual having the power to impact the impressionable minds utilise every opportunity to encourage development of values. Any message coming from upper echelons within an institution can have major impact as it resonates in the entire institution. The student who has stolen the iPod, should be made to go without a device which is exceptionally valuable for them, for a period of one week to be able to perceive and understand the result of his action on the other individual. This can develop empathy and in the future the person will be more likely to try to understand the impact of every action of theirs on all involved stakeholders.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.