to be actionable the conduct must be so servers that it exceeds the bounds of de
ID: 398651 • Letter: T
Question
to be actionable the conduct must be so servers that it exceeds the bounds of decency accepted by Q Search this course blem Blueprint 4.1 Check My Work (t ren Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress hile living in her home country of Tanzania, Sophia Kiwanuka signed an employment contract with Anne Margareth Bakilana, a Tanzanian living in Washington, D wanuka traveled to the United States to work as a babysitter and maid in Bakilana's house when Kiwan ka arrived Bakla na cnnsated her passport hed her olation, and forced her to work long hours under threat of having her deported. Kiwanuka worked seven days a week without breaks and was subjected to regula d psychological abuse by Bakilana. Kiwanuka fled a complaint against Bakilana for intentional infiction of emotional distress, among other claims. Bakilana argue wanuka's complaint should be dismissed because the allegations were insufficient to show outrageous intentional conduct that resulted in severe emotional distres u were the judge, in whose favor would you rule? Why? tentional infliction of emotional distress can be defined as Select and Select conduct resulting in severe emotional distress to another To be actionable, the conduct must be so severe that it exceeds the bounds of decency accepted by Select Acts that are irritating generally are Select and usually Select ahoore ewno a cam of netiction without e evidence to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress. Threatening conduct coupied with repeated annoyances can be (Selecet to support a claim of intentional infiction of emotional distress. When the outrageous conduct consists of speech about a Select aims. Jthe First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech Select emotional distress Kiwanuka signed her employment contract with Bakilana while living in Tanzania. This fact will Select Kiwanuka's cdlaim of intentional infliction of emotional istressExplanation / Answer
Correct answers are in underlined and bold fonts
Intentional infliction of emotional distress can be defined as extreme and outrageous conduct resulting in severe emotional distress to another.
To be actionable, the conduct must be so severe that it exceeds the bounds of decency accepted by _society_.
Acts that are irritating generally are insufficient and usually not enough without more evidence to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Threatening conduct coupled with repeated annoyances can be sufficient to support a claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
When the outrageous conduct consists of speech about a public figure, the First Amendment's guarantee of freedom of speech limits emotional distress claims.
Kiwanuka signed her employment contract with Bakilana while living in Tanzania. This fact will not impact Kiwanuka's claim of intentional infliction of emotional distress.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.