Question: Summarize the whole content in about 250 words (two hundred fifty word

Question

Question: Summarize the whole content in about 250 words (two hundred fifty words). Clearly, identify your recommendation from the case study and Mention the recommendation as the Main heading.

Case: The company was charged with an unfair labor practice for failure to bargain in good faith. The union alleged that the company was engaged in surface bargaining with no intention of entering into a collective bargaining agreement. The company had begun meeting with the union after the NLRB had certified it. Eighteen bargaining sessions were held over an 11-month period. The negotiations did not result in a contract. The parties did reach agreement on a recognition clause; the numbers, rights, and duties of union stewards; the use of a bulletin board by the union; pay for jury duty and other leaves of absence; a procedure for processing grievances and arbitrations; and plant visitation by union representatives.

The administrative law judge hearing the case found that the company met at regular intervals and bore no antiunion animus. The company’s conduct away from the bargaining table did not indicate that the company had no intention to conclude an agreement with the union. As there was no evidence of a failure to meet to discuss terms and conditions, the arbitrator had to examine the proposals by the company and by the union to see whether their substance indicated good-faith bargaining. The company’s proposals are briefly outlined as follows:

1. Wages. The company insisted that it remain in total control over wages. Wage increases were to be determined on the basis of semiannual merit reviews, in which the union would have no participation. The union had proposed a specific wage schedule, but the company would not adopt it.

2. Management rights. The company retained absolute right to subcontract work, to assign it to supervisors, to abolish jobs, and to transfer, discontinue, or assign any or all of its operations to others. It required the union to relinquish the employees’ statutory right to notice in bargaining over such actions and their effects. Actions taken under the management clause were subject to the grievance procedure only if that right was limited by express contract provision, and there was no such limitation.

3. Zipper clause. The company proposed a zipper clause, which waived the union’s right to bargain during the life of the agreement over anything that could have been considered mandatory or permissive under existing law.

4. No-strike clause. The company proposed a no-strike clause, including prohibition against a strike for unfair labor or unfair employment practices.

5. Discipline and discharge. The company rejected the union’s proposal of a standard right to discipline an employee for “just or sufficient cause only.” The company intended to reserve exclusive authority over discharges and discipline in the management rights clause.

6. Layoff and recall. The company proposed that the layoff and recall of employees would be at the company’s sole discretion.

7. Dues check-off. The company rejected a union proposal that a dues check-off clause be included in the contract.

8. Nondiscrimination clause. The company rejected a union proposal that stated the company was not allowed to discriminate against union members. The company’s position was that because discrimination was illegal, a clause forbidding it did not need to be included in the contract.

Explanation / Answer

Employers have a authorized duty to discount in excellent religion with their staff' consultant and to sign any collective bargaining agreement that has been reached. This obligation encompasses many responsibilities, together with a duty not to make distinct alterations with out bargaining with the union and not to pass the union and deal immediately with workers it represents. These examples barely scratch the outside. Given the complexity and importance of this subject, employers should . . .

Part 8(d) of the Act units forth what is encompassed within the responsibility to bargain collectively. Section 8(a)(5) of the Act makes it an unfair labor observe for an service provider "to refuse to cut price together with the representatives of its workers, field to the provisions of section 9(a)" of the Act. (An agency that violates section 8(a)(5) additionally derivatively violates part 8(a)(1).) For example, you may also not

Make changes in wages, hours, working stipulations, or different obligatory subjects of bargaining before negotiating with the union to agreement or total impasse, until (1) the union prevents the parties from reaching contract or deadlock; (2) economic exigencies compel immediate action; or (3) the proposed alternate concerns a discrete, ordinary occasion scheduled to recur in the midst of bargaining (reminiscent of an annual benefit-wage evaluate), and also you give the union observe and possibility to bargain over that matter.
Fail to satisfy with the union at affordable times and cheap intervals.
Fail to cut price in good religion concerning obligatory subjects of bargaining.
Have interaction in dangerous-religion, floor, or piecemeal bargaining.
Refuse to furnish knowledge the union requests that is important to the bargaining approach or to the workers' phrases or stipulations of employment.
Refuse to signal a writing that accommodates a collective-bargaining agreement you've reached with the union.
Modify any time period of a collective-bargaining contract without the union's consent.
Make unilateral changes in terms and conditions of employment for the period of the term of a collective-bargaining contract, unless the union has evidently and unmistakably waived its correct to discount or the change is just too minor to require bargaining. (do not expect that a change you deem minor could be so seen by using the Board.)
Refuse to cut price over the consequences of a transformation within the scope and direction of your company, although you needn't bargain over the alternate itself on account that it issues a topic on the core of your entrepreneurial manipulate of your corporation. (whether a proposed trade is a nonbargainable "scope and direction" change or a necessary subject of bargaining may just reward a difficult legal query. Nevertheless, subcontracting that simply substitutes one workforce for one other to do the equal work below identical conditions of employment is not a nonbargainable "scope and course" change.)

Refuse to admire and discount with a union that represents employees of an agency whose business you might be acquiring in case you are a Burns successor. See NLRB v. Burns international security offerings, 406 U.S. 272 (1972). You are a Burns successor when you rent the majority of your employees from the predecessor's group of workers, and from their viewpoint every day existence at work stays generally unchanged. (you can also, however, earlier than hiring your personnel, set preliminary terms and stipulations of employment without bargaining with the union, except you're a "flawlessly clear" Burns successor. See under.)
Set initial terms and conditions of employment before bargaining with the union if you're a "flawlessly clear" Burns successor - that is, if you're making it perfectly clear that you simply plan to preserve all the predecessor's workers, or at least sufficient of them to make it evident that the union's majority status will continue, with out informing them that they will be expected to work beneath different terms.
Refuse to appreciate and discount with a union that represents staff of an organization whose business you might be obtaining, if you happen to refuse to hire the predecessor's staff on the grounds that they're unionized. In other phrases, in case you discriminate in hiring to prevent becoming a Burns successor, you emerge as a Burns successor - and a "flawlessly clear" one at that. See under.
Set preliminary terms and stipulations of employment before bargaining with the union, in case you acquire a trade and refuse to hire employees of the predecessor to prevent becoming a Burns successor.
Set preliminary phrases and stipulations of employment earlier than bargaining with the union, if you are a Burns successor and you inform your workers that you'll no longer permit them to be represented through the union.
Keep away from your bargaining or contractual duties underneath the Act through transferring operations to a nominally distinctive trade entity that's in basic terms the disguised continuance or "alter ego" of your former unionized business.
Bypass the union and deal immediately with workers. (nevertheless, you may also be in contact to your staff accurate understanding about your bargaining proposals.)
Refuse to furnish, or unreasonably extend in furnishing, understanding the union requests that's important to and moderately integral for the performance of its representative services, with specific exceptions.
Insist to impasse on a idea concerning a permissive area of bargaining, or require agreement on a permissive discipline as a precondition to further bargaining. Permissive topics comprise, for instance, unit scope, selection of a bargaining representative, interior union affairs, and agreement of unfair labor practice expenditures.
Insist to deadlock on a proposal involving an illegal discipline of bargaining, or comprise an illegal clause in a labor contract. Illegal subjects incorporate, for example, a suggestion to make the contract terminable at will or to give the business enterprise the proper to discharge employees for union undertaking.
Lock out staff in aid of an impermissible objective - e.G., to stress the union to receive an unlawful bargaining notion, a foul-faith bargaining position, or terms unilaterally carried out absent a valid impasse.
Lock out employees to pressure the union to consent to a midterm contract amendment.
Lock out employees over a permissive field of bargaining.
Lock out employees with out evidently informing them of the stipulations they ought to meet to be reinstated.
Declare deadlock and refuse to cut price where a legitimate deadlock has no longer been reached.
Declare deadlock and implement terms where a legitimate deadlock has now not been reached.
Declare impasse and enforce phrases not encompassed inside a preimpasse offer.
Put into effect, upon impasse, a wage notion vesting in you unlimited discretion over future pay increases, or every other notion that will be illegal under the Board's reasoning in McClatchy Newspapers, 321 NLRB 1386 (1996).
File an election (RM) petition for those who lack a excellent-faith, affordable uncertainty that the incumbent union still enjoys majority aid.
Poll your represented staff related to their aid for the incumbent union in case you lack a excellent-religion, reasonable uncertainty that the union nonetheless enjoys majority help.
Withdraw realization from a union that enjoys majority help.
Withdraw awareness from a union that has misplaced majority help should you assisted the staff' antiunion petition effort or undermined their union aid by way of unfair labor practices.
File an election (RM) petition, poll your represented workers, or withdraw awareness from a Board-certified union in the course of the union's certification year or Board-ordered extension thereof.
File an election (RM) petition, ballot your represented employees, or withdraw attention from a union (1) you well-known voluntarily, or (2) with whom the Board has ordered you to cut price, or (3) with whom you've gotten agreed to cut price as a part of a contract agreement, or (four) with whom you could have acquired a bargaining relationship from a unionized predecessor earlier than an affordable time for bargaining has elapsed.
File an election (RM) petition, poll your represented staff, or withdraw awareness from a union during the term of a collective-bargaining agreement, as much as three years.
Terminate or regulate a collective-bargaining contract without serving written discover on the union at the least 60 days (90 days if you're a healthcare company) before the expiration date of the contract.
Terminate or adjust a collective-bargaining agreement without giving realize to federal and state mediators within 30 days (60 days if you are a healthcare organisation) of serving written observe on the union that you're terminating or editing the contract.
Lock out staff before 60 days have handed (ninety days if you are a healthcare enterprise) after you serve written become aware of on the union that you are terminating or modifying the contract or before the expiration date of the contract, whichever is later.
Lock out employees in case you are the initiating occasion of a contract amendment or termination, and also you fail to give notice to federal and state mediators inside 30 days (60 days if you're a healthcare corporation) of serving written become aware of on the union that you're terminating or modifying the contract.
Terminate or adjust a collective-bargaining contract without offering to satisfy and discount regarding a brand new or modified contract.
Change the status quo from the time a board of inquiry is appointed underneath section 213 of the Labor administration members of the family Act unless 15 days after it problems its document (applies to healthcare employers handiest).
However, you may also, for example

undertake or anticipate a unionized predecessor's collective-bargaining agreement whilst you accumulate its industry, continue its operations generally unchanged, and hire a majority of your employees from the predecessor's personnel. You too can decline to undertake or anticipate a predecessor's collective-bargaining agreement and set initial phrases and conditions of employment with out bargaining. The right to set preliminary employment terms ends after getting employed a tremendous and consultant complement of staff, a majority of whom are drawn from the predecessor's personnel. (you can also no longer, nevertheless, set preliminary terms and stipulations with out bargaining if you are a "flawlessly clear" Burns successor - that's, if you're making it flawlessly clear that you simply plan to preserve all the predecessor's workers, or as a minimum sufficient of them to make it evident that the union's majority reputation will proceed, without informing them that they'll be anticipated to work under one-of-a-kind phrases.)
cut price with the union separately or by way of a multi-company association (if all members of the multi-business enterprise staff comply with be bound and the union is of the same opinion).
Bargain tough, offered you seek in just right faith to reach an agreement.
Cut price with the union regarding permissive subjects of bargaining, however not to deadlock.
Lock out your staff where your sole intent in doing so is to bring financial strain to undergo in help of a respectable bargaining role.
Implement phrases encompassed within a preimpasse offer if negotiations with the union have reached a legitimate impasse.
Make changes within the scope and course of your manufacturer - concerns that lie on the core of your entrepreneurial manage of your business - with out bargaining about the trade. You have got to, nevertheless, cut price with the union involving the consequences of the exchange on unit workers. (whether or not a precise trade is a nonbargainable "scope and path" change or a mandatory discipline of bargaining may present a problematic authorized question. Nevertheless, subcontracting that in basic terms substitutes one personnel for an extra to do the equal work underneath equivalent conditions of employment will not be a nonbargainable "scope and course" change.)
Make unilateral changes which are minor, or the place the union has certainly and unmistakably waived bargaining. (do not expect that a change you deem minor would be so considered by the Board.)
Withdraw recognition from a union after the collective-bargaining contract expires. This applies simplest to employers in the building enterprise whose bargaining relationship with the union is governed by means of part eight(f) of the Act, not part 9(a).
Withdraw attention from a union that has in reality lost majority aid if the union's presumption of majority fame is rebuttable. (A union enjoys an irrebutable presumption of majority reputation (1) throughout the certification year and any extensions thereof; (2) for a "affordable interval" following voluntary awareness, Burns successorship, a contract contract wherein you agree to cut price, or the Board's issuance of an affirmative bargaining order; and (3) for the period of the term of a collective-bargaining contract, up to 3 years.)
poll your workers involving their help for the incumbent union if the union's presumption of majority popularity is rebuttable (see above), and you have a excellent-religion, reasonable uncertainty that the union still enjoys majority support. The union ought to receive cheap increase observe of the time and position of the ballot, and the poll ought to be carried out in keeping with special safeguards. You have to no longer have engaged in unfair labor practices or in any other case created a coercive atmosphere. Moreover, you ought to (1) keep up a correspondence to employees that the cause of the poll is to verify whether or not the union enjoys majority help (and that have got to, in reality, be your purpose); (2) provide workers assurances towards reprisal; and (3) habits the ballot with the aid of secret ballot.
Refuse to speak about or conform to any modification of the terms of an current contract. You can also consent to do so

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse Q
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.