To what extent do you think the trial before the ICJ of the two Libyans accused

Question

To what extent do you think the trial before the ICJ of the two Libyans accused of bombing PAN AM flight 103 over Lockerbie Scotland in 1988 serves as a precedent for prosecuting terrorists, or do you think it was a unique political and legal compromise worked out by the various countries involved?

To what extent do you think the trial before the ICJ of the two Libyans accused of bombing PAN AM flight 103 over Lockerbie Scotland in 1988 serves as a precedent for prosecuting terrorists, or do you think it was a unique political and legal compromise worked out by the various countries involved?

Explanation / Answer

Definitely provision of this kind of decision and presenting Libyan terrorist in front of International Court of Justice for fair treatment was the most important approach that should be taken with each and every terrorist. As the bombing happened over the Scottish airzone, availability of fait decisions was made by quotation quotes and implementation of such specific type of approach directly increase overall dependency as well as fairness in operating environment. International Court of Justice be directly provide decisions based on fare conditions buy it understanding requirements of the specific case this decision was adequately taken by the International Court of Justice where one accused was found guilty and other one was released as per the justice provided by the International Court of Justice.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse T
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.