advocate whether closing our borders should be one of the potential measures tak

Question

advocate whether closing our borders should be one of the potential measures taken to combat a serious outbreak of a deadly disease. If you argue in favor of this, include, e.g. what measures/steps should be taken prior to closing the borders. Is there a way to gradually enact this? Is there a way to partially close borders, i.e. only international flights from certain countries? All international flights? All international travelers? Etc... Whether you argue for or against it, be sure to include some rights which might be violated, both for citizens and foreign nationals. Give statutory references, including from state or federal law and/or the Constitution either way.

Explanation / Answer

Losing the border would not be an appropriate approach but partially crossing the border as well as implementing strong check while possibility of a disease that could be spread in the country is along the. In this specific situation, strong measures should be taken for medication of this infectious disease and to prevent the disease to spread in a specific country. As availability of Technology has very widely increased, using fetch specific tools for scanning as well as checking people at the airport for initial symptoms of any deadly disease will be the most appropriate way of implementation of a plan.

Closing the border would definitely create an economic impact on the total business industry of a country which would directly reduce the overall revenue generation plant affecting the overall growth of the country. Format occasion of this problem, implementing a strong check where the people are in coming to the country is required.

For an example, when chicken pox was eradicated vigorously, various airports used thermal scanner to check the patients as well as I did not allowed some of the patient with fever to enter the various countries. This type of approach reduces the impact of spreading disease by a huge margin as availability of option for differently Limited because of the person being stopped at the entry rather than being carried to a country spreading a deadly disease to their people.

This approach does compromise individual drive but this process is work done for betterment of all the population or for the common good. As it directly violates the idea of individual rights, it directly creates an impact on the common good save millions of people from getting infected from a deadly disease creating a negative impact on society. Many of the societies were also focus for vaccination their vaccine was provided by targeting the possible patients and their possible connections.

We can partially close the border but losing the border completely would definitely lead to a huge loss affecting the overall economy of the specific country while limiting the number of people getting inside the country would be an appropriate option and giving a track of the specific actions would also provide an adequate support to the available policy of operation making it more efficient and effective.

P.S.- please leave a comment if explanation is needed

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse A
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.