Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

3. n article in the Journal of Strain Analysis (vol.18, no. 2. 1983) compares se

ID: 387342 • Letter: 3

Question



3. n article in the Journal of Strain Analysis (vol.18, no. 2. 1983) compares several procedures for preacting the shear strength for steel plate girders. Data for nine girders in the form of the ratio of predicted to observed load for two of these procedures, the Karlsruhe and Lehigh methods, are as follows: Girder Karlsruhe Method Lehigh Method Difference Difference'2 SI/ 1.186 S2/1 15 S3/1 1.322 S4I 1.339 SS/1 1.200 S2/1 1402 S2/2 1.365 S2/3 1.537 S2/4 1.559 0.015625 0.025281 0.067081 0.076729 0.018225 0.050176 0.107584 0.203401 0.257049 1.061 0.992 1.062 1.065 1.178 1.037 1.086 1.052 0.125 0.159 0.259 0277 0.135 0224 0.328 0.451 0.507 to support a claim that there is a difference in mean performance 2 between the two methods? Use alpha -0.05. (you can use paired t-test)

Explanation / Answer

Let us look at the predicted value

Karlsruhe Method

Lehigh Method

Difference

S1/1

1.186

1.061

0.125

S2/1

1.151

0.992

0.159

S3/1

1.322

1.063

0.259

S4/1

1.339

1.062

0.277

S5/1

1.200

1.065

0.135

S2/1

1.402

1.178

0.224

S2/2

1.365

1.037

0.328

S2/3

1.537

1.086

0.451

S2/4

1.559

1.052

0.507

Validating it with paired t test

Calculating mean and standard deviation of difference:

Mean or Average = (0.125+0.159+0.259+0.277+0.135+0.224+0.328+0.451+0.507)/9 = 0.273

Standard deviation of difference: 0.135

SE(d)= Sd/n^1/2   = 0.135 /(9)^1/2

                                 = 0.045

So, we have:

                                            T= 0.273 / 0.045 =6.06

     As alpha = 0.05

Therefore 95% confidence interval

D+- t* Sd/(n)^1/2

Where t is the 2.5% point of the t-distribution with 8 degree of freedom is 2.5% of 1.86 = 0.04

              0.135 +-(0.045 X 0.04)

At 95% confidence interval

       = (0.136 , 0.133)

Therefore there is difference in mean performance of both method

Karlsruhe Method

Lehigh Method

Difference

S1/1

1.186

1.061

0.125

S2/1

1.151

0.992

0.159

S3/1

1.322

1.063

0.259

S4/1

1.339

1.062

0.277

S5/1

1.200

1.065

0.135

S2/1

1.402

1.178

0.224

S2/2

1.365

1.037

0.328

S2/3

1.537

1.086

0.451

S2/4

1.559

1.052

0.507

Hire Me For All Your Tutoring Needs
Integrity-first tutoring: clear explanations, guidance, and feedback.
Drop an Email at
drjack9650@gmail.com
Chat Now And Get Quote