Assume that a car owner contracts with a mechanic to have his engine overhauled.
ID: 379834 • Letter: A
Question
Assume that a car owner contracts with a mechanic to have his engine overhauled. The mechanic mistakenly used original equipment quality piston rings in doing the overhaul, whereas the
contract had called for the use of premium quality rings that are better than original equipment
quality. Assume that the rings used by the mechanic should not affect the performance of the car.
Which of the following is true?
A) This is a substantial performance, and the owner must still pay something to the mechanic.
B) This is a novation, and the owner owes nothing to the mechanic.
C) This is a substantial performance, and the owner owes nothing to the mechanic. D) This is a material breach, and the owner owes nothing to the mechanic.
E) This is a material breach, and the owner must still pay something to the mechanic.
Explanation / Answer
Answer- A. This is a substantial performance, and the owner must still pay something to the mechanic. Substantial performance occurs when the performance id poor or insufficient but this will not affect the value of the contract, like here the rings quality did not affect the performance the car. Even though the performance is not being affected the owner is obligated to payment in case of substantial performance.
Related Questions
drjack9650@gmail.com
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.