awnser the question 18-1 Rusiness Scenarios and Case Proble Wrongful Discharge.
ID: 374701 • Letter: A
Question
awnser the question 18-1
Rusiness Scenarios and Case Proble Wrongful Discharge. Denton and Carlo worked at an e plant. Their job required them to do occasional maintenance work while standing on a wire mesh twenty feet ahove the plant floor. Other employees had fallen through the mesh, and one was killed by the fall. When Denton and Carlo were asked by their supervisor to do work that would likely require them to their fear of bodily harm or death. Because of their refusal to do the requested work heir jobs. Was their discharge wrongful? If so, under what federal employment law? What federal agency or depart- ment could assist them? (See pages 517-521.) , the two employees were fired from 5 2 Question with Sample Answer-Disparate-ImpactExplanation / Answer
It is the primary responsibility of every employer to provide a safe working environment to their employees. If workers find the workplace to be unsafe, they may report the violation to the employer, to the federal or to the United States Department of Labor. The United States Department of Labor have a dedicated wing called “Occupational Safety and Health Administration” (OSHA) that requires the employers to provide a safe and danger free workplace to its employees. The working environment is considered as safe if the employees can work freely without worrying about the danger of illness, injury or death. All the employers have to abide by the safety standards and guidelines as stated by the OSHA.
In the given business scenario, Denton and Carlo were asked by their employer to work in unsafe and dangerous working conditions. There have been instances in the past where one of the employee was killed by falling through the mesh. The incident highlights that the work conditions at the appliance plant were hazardous that may cause death or serious injury. Denton and Carlo, under the OSHA act, had rightly brought it to the notice of their employer. But, instead of taking initiatives to make the workplace safe, the employer fired both of them from their jobs. Both the employees have the complete right to refuse to work on the grounds of the imminent danger at the workplace that poses a substantial risk of serious physical injury or even death. Therefore, the discharge of both the employees was completely wrong.
Denton and Carlo have the options of filing a complaint with OSHA of United States Department of Labor. As per the regulations of OSHA, an employer is prohibited from taking actions against the employee who has reported a violation of the safety norms at the workplace. The possible actions by the employer against the employee may include termination from the work, reduction in wages, or demotion to a lower position.
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.