CASE ACTIVITY 10-4, Bad intentions, as opposed to negligence, are the foundation

Question

CASE ACTIVITY 10-4, Bad intentions, as opposed to negligence, are the foundation of almost all criminality and greatly enhance any civil liability. CASE ACTVITY 11-3, Spotlight on Taco Bell – Implied Contract. Please do not worry about the discussion of "pre-emption" in this case. This is an issue that generally is unrelated to the issue of implied contracts. As you read about the facts, please keep in mind the public policy behind enforcing "implied contracts." CASE ACTIVITY 12-5, This case broadens the “mirror image rule,” at least in terms of Acceptance.

Explanation / Answer

Any individual or person who failed to comply any requirement due to neglgence and work is imposed under this subchapter with respect to any consumer that person is liable for penality to that consumer and amount is equal to the sum of—

1 - Actual damages beared by the consumer due to negligence or non compliance

2 - in other case attorney fees decided by court.

As per case if person did that with bad inetnsion as opposed to negligence that will greatly enhance civil liability due mens rea (criminal liability case). Baiically in tort person doing anything with bad motivr is not comes under tort that is covered under criminal law and if its considered under civil in that case liability will defenetly strict.

Related Questions

Navigate

• Browse (All)
• Browse C
• Subjects

Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.