Academic Integrity: tutoring, explanations, and feedback — we don’t complete graded work or submit on a student’s behalf.

1. Cuddy and coauthors suggest your strength or competence is not established by

ID: 363492 • Letter: 1

Question

1. Cuddy and coauthors suggest your strength or competence is not established by the following:

a. Your performance.

b. Your reputation.

c. Your title or position in the company.

d. Your presence.

e. Your ability to appear menacing.

  

2. Based on studies by Amy Cuddy her coauthors which of the following is true:

a. If you show warmth and low competence people you can still influence people.

b. If you show no warmth and no competence, people will give you passive support.

c. If you show warmth and competence, you will get the highest support for your ideas.

d. If you show moderate warmth and moderate competence, you will be pitied.

  

3. Kevin Cashman’s “Ten Bobs” refers to which of the following:

a. Meetings in which everyone is named Robert or Bob or even Roberta.

b. Ten out of fifteen people in a meeting said “yes, Bob” to the CEO.

c. Ten percent of employees leave a company because of poor interactions with their boss, who was named Bob.

d. Everyone in a meeting said they were fully committed when in fact they were not.

Explanation / Answer

Answer 1)

The authors suggested that you should build trust with the people and try to connect with them. By appearing a menace, you would not increase your strength and thus the answer is E.

Your ability to appear menacing

Answer 2)

As Amy Cuddy continued to above explanation , he said to build trust you need to demonstrate the your warmth towards them and connect to them giving a human touch and you can influence their thoughts etc. Thus the answer is A.

If you show warmth and low competence people you can still influence people.

Answer 3)

Kevin Cashmans's "Ten Bobs" is the situation where everyone in the team agrees to what their boss has to say and thats why this term was coined. So the answer is D.

Everyone in a meeting said they were fully committed when in fact they were not.