“ There is an argument that emotions are necessary for thoughtand as computer ca
ID: 3616583 • Letter: #
Question
“There is an argument that emotions are necessary for thoughtand as computer cannot have emotions, therefore it is difficult tobuild a computer that thinks. But on the other hand, with theadvent of new technology especially quantum computers, scientistsbelieve that cognitive research will boost up and they will be ableto develop ways for computers to learn emotions. Do you thinkmachines with emotions will be beneficial for humans or it will bedestructive? Support your answer with explanation of at least oneof its application area.”Explanation / Answer
Emotion. By Ronald de Sousa. Entry in the StanfordEncyclopedia of Philosophy. "several philosophers and computerscientists have sustained to be concerned in integrating computingtheory with emotions. Aaron Sloman has elaborated the sort of ideasthat were embryonic in Shank and Colby into a more sophisticatedcomputational theory of the mind in which emotions are virtualmachines, playing a crucial part in a intricate hierarchicarchitecture in which they control, monitor, schedule andoccasionally disrupt other control modules. (Wright, Sloman &Beaudoin 1996). Rosalind Picard (1997) lays out the evidence forthe view that computers will need emotions to be truly intelligent,and in particular to cooperate intelligently with humans. She alsoadverts to the role of emotions in evaluation and the pruning ofsearch spaces. But she is as to a great extent or more fretful toprovide an emotional theory of computation than to intricate acomputational theory of emotions. Lastly, a forthcoming book byMarvin Minsky bears the promising title of The emotionmachine."
Related Questions
Navigate
Integrity-first tutoring: explanations and feedback only — we do not complete graded work. Learn more.